Intel Cuts Solid State Disk Drive Prices

By  |  Tuesday, July 21, 2009 at 8:46 pm

Intel increasing the performance of its X series of solid-state disks (SSDs), and is reducing its prices by as much as 60 percent, according to reports. The price cut, combined with increased capacity, could lead to SSD adoption in mainstream systems.

Unlike convention hard drives, SSDs contain no moving parts, and significantly reduce latency for data retrieval by behaving more like memory than a disk. They are often used in high-end laptops such as the MacBook Air, gaming PCs, and servers. However, they do use more energy, and have a finite lifespan.

Intel has shifted to a new manufacturing process that provides higher density data storage, compressing more data into chips. Consequently, its costs are lower, and it can pass some of the savings onto customers. A 80GB X series drive now costs 60 percent less than a year ago, and 160GB units are 47% less, according to CNET. The prices are $225 and $440, respectively.

Microsoft’s Windows 7 is optimized for SSD drives, and could help them become more common in mid-range consumer PCs over time. Pricing has been a significant factor in SSD adoption in notebooks, as price increases have wrought a corresponding decrease in sales.

As sales increase, Intel and other memory manufacturers will inevitably reach economies of scale, resulting in further reductions. Affordable, higher capacity SSD drives will arrive; it is just a matter of when.

 
1 Comment


Read more: ,

1 Comments For This Post

  1. GR Says:

    “However, they do use more energy, and have a finite lifespan”

    The first statement is just plain incorrect. In fact modern SSD’s like the Intel X-25M use much less energy than an equivalent HDD with a spinning platter.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/gallery/,0101-157170-0—-jpg-.html

    The second part of that statement is a myth. The myth of write endurance and lifespan has also been addressed and is not worth repeating any more for modern SSD’s. With average laptop lifetimes measured in small single digit years it is unlikely that any of us would ever bump up against the write endurance lifetime of these drives even if we used them for 10 times the average laptop lifespan. Read the article below to bust this one.

    http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html

    Have any of you ever ‘worn out’ the flash on an iPod/iPhone, etc all of which use flash memory? I didn’t think so.

    SSD’d, due to their solid state architecture also have *much* higher MTBF rates and can sustain physical abuse (G-Shock) that no existing spinning HDD’s come close to withstanding.

    SSD’s are not the future of storage, they are the *now* of storage for those who crave high performance and reliability. The only remaining barrier is cost.