Chrome OS is Delayed, and That’s Okay

By  |  Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 8:32 am

As 2010 winds down, it seems unlikely that Google and its hardware partners will launch any Chrome OS netbooks this year.

Last week, Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt said Chrome OS netbooks won’t be available for the holidays, but the company’s spokespeople aren’t as candid, telling TechCrunch, “We’re not going into details at this point.” MG Siegler guesses that we’ll see the cloud-based operating system in beta this year, with actual retail products in early 2011.

And that’s fine. Chrome OS needn’t be rushed to market. Google should take all the time it needs.

There’s been a lot of Chrome OS skepticism over the last year, mostly because Android has been a big hit, and because tablets are hogging all the buzz that netbooks once had. Not surprisingly, Google’s been downplaying Chrome OS’s touch screen potential, stressing that it’s meant for traditional laptops, and possibly desktops.

With that in mind, arguing that Chrome OS missed the boat misunderstands what the operating system is trying to accomplish. Of course Android was an overnight success; the smartphone and tablet markets are exploding, so there’s room for everyone to grow. Case in point: Android handsets accounted for a quarter of the smartphone market last quarter, according to Gartner, but that didn’t stop the iPhone from doubling its sales over the last year.

If Chrome OS’s goal is to disrupt Windows and Mac OS X, it’s going to be a much slower burn. To be a success, the cloud operating system needs constant connectivity and enough awesome Web apps to make people forget about installing software. The former won’t really be possible until 4G networks are everywhere, and the latter is going to take a long time as Google builds the Chrome Web Store and services like Google Cloud Print. The OS has little to gain by launching early. (Windows 8, which could sync everything to the cloud, is a couple years away.)

You could argue that Android and iOS will continue scaling upwards, and eventually mobile and desktop operating systems will merge as one. At that point, can anyone really predict what’s going to happen with existing operating systems? For now, Google has capitalized on the smartphone boom with Android while experimenting with what it thinks is the future of computing. No need to force the latter.

 
3 Comments


Read more: 

3 Comments For This Post

  1. @anujahooja Says:

    Great article, Jared – and I completely agree. This is Google's baby: nothing external, purely homegrown down from the root. They need to make sure this is perfect and not something put together sloppily for later-iteration clean up. But I really do hope we get a better glimpse of it in the next few weeks – I'm really interested in trying out an official build.

    And just a typo: "with actual retail products in early 2010" — *2011 [ just wanted to point it out :) ]

  2. JaredNewman Says:

    Thanks Anuj. Fixed that typo.

  3. dholyer Says:

    If you have used Windows since 1995 you have had to put up with the many bugs that come with the first versions, and us the retail buyers seem to have been the free test crew of the Microsoft products, They did not have to pay people to test and debug flaws, the public that they made profits off of indirectly worked for free.

    Would it not be nice if someone can figure a way to convert the release contract that the users (aka debugging testers) could convert that contract into a payroll contract for working for Microsoft.

    I think I have better hope of inventing the matter/energy/matter transporter than getting my due share of Microsoft money.

    In summary I hope the release delay in Chrome O/S helps prevent or lesson the debugging game that Microsoft put us through. And I wonder how long until it replaces the Google TV Android OS for my Dish 722k Satellite box.

Comment on This Story