This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009

After ten years like these, the remaining 990 in this millennium have gotta be at least a little less goofy, right?

By Harry McCracken | Sunday, December 20, 2009 at 9:22 pm

2005

34. Bizarrely, Stephen Hawking’s number wasn’t included.
T-Mobile confirms that ubersocialite Paris Hilton’s Sidekick account has been hacked. The phone numbers of Christina Aguilera, Vin Diesel, Eminem, Anna Kournikova, Andy Roddick, Ashlee Simpson, and other Hilton pals all wind up exposed on the Web.

35. That’s some random stranger’s account, but yes, it did load lickety-split.
Google introduces Google Web Accelerator, a short-lived piece of Windows software that “uses the power of Google’s global computer network to make web pages load faster.” It also includes a bug that lets people see other users’ discussion groups and other password-protected information.

36. To misquote the Video Professor, “Don’t try my product.”
A Cnet story about privacy concerns over Google illustrates its point by providing information about Google CEO Eric Schmidt found via Googling: his salary, neighborhood, political contributions, and more. Schmidt responds by instituting a year-long ban on responding to inquiries from Cnet. It ends after a couple of months.

37. And yet Apple inexplicably continued with plans for the iPhone.
Rumors that iTunes will land on phones turn out to be true when Steve Jobs demos Motorola’s ROKR onstage at an Apple event. When Jobs shows how you can pause music and take a call, he pushes the wrong button and the feature fails to work. News reports later say that consumers are returning the phone at six times the usual rate.

38. But it’s SONY spyware!
Security expert Mark Russinovich discovers that a Sony BMG CD he’s bought has copy-protection that silently installed a risky, difficult-to-uninstall rootkit on his PC. Trojan-horse writers soon take advantage of Sony BMG’s software to attack its customers computers; Sony BMG says it’s “temporarily suspending” use of the copy-protection technology. It ends up paying $5.75 million to end investigations into its actions by 42 U.S. states.

2006

39. Unpronounceable but catchy.
At the Consumer Electronics Show, Intel gets Tom Hanks, Morgan Freeman, and Danny DeVito to help it roll out Viiv, a new platform for media-savvy home PCs. Consumers have trouble figuring out what it is (and how to say it); PC vendors don’t jump on the bandwagon with great abandon. By 2007, the press is referring to it in the past tense.

40. Also, their name sounded too much like “Gizmodo.”
A few months after launching its Gizmondo gaming handheld in the U.S., Tiger Telematics declares bankruptcy and discontinues the device. It had burned through $300 million. In a weird coda, Swedish cofounder Stefan Eriksson crashes and totals a $2 million Ferrari Enzo a few weeks later while driving along the Pacific Coast Highway near Malibu. He claims a mysterious stranger named Dietrich was at the wheel, but is eventually arrested on suspicion of embezzlement, grand theft auto, driving while intoxicated, cocaine possession, and on weapons charges.

41. This is why Santa’s workshop runs Linux.
Windows honcho Jim Allchin ruins Christmas for the world’s PC makers by announcing in March that the shipping schedule for Windows Vista has slipped. Consumers won’t be able to buy computers with the new OS until January 2007, leaving manufacturers offering machines running a five-year-old OS for the 2006 holiday season.

42. They should have stuck with the “Windows Vista Inadequate” ones.
In the face of Vista’s delays, Microsoft encourages PC manufacturers to slap “Windows Vista Capable” stickers on XP machines. The stickers turn out only to mean that the computer can run the lower-end versions of Vista, and don’t guarantee they’re able to use the new OSes’ signature Aero interface. Legal hijinks ensue, and internal Microsoft documents suggest the company knew it had a problem on its hands even as it was egging on consumers to buy cheap XP machines with Vista in mind.

43. If you have to ask what the chartreuse one costs, you can’t afford it.
Apple releases a new consumer laptop called the MacBook. The model in a matte black case costs $150 more than an identically-configured shiny white one.

44. Tubular!
U.S. Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) helps explain Net Neutrality by saying the Internet is not “a big truck,” but rather “a series of tubes.”

45. And once you’re gone, your loved ones would be insane to cancel, too.
An AOL customer who tries to cancel his service records and then releases a terrifying phone call in which an AOL rep named John “helps” him by repeatedly refusing to terminate the account. It turns out AOL uses an 81-page manual (cover line: “You Gotta Love It!”) to train reps to convince customers not to flee.

46. On the plus side, sleeping reps can’t browbeat you if you try to cancel.
During a visit from a service technician, a Comcast customer shoots video of the tech snoozing on his sofa.

47. Hey, they’re only AOL users.
AOL releases twenty million search keywords entered by 650,000 search-engine users, supposedly for the benefit of researchers. The searches have been anonymized, but The New York Times and others discover it’s possible to identify who performed some of them. AOL declares the release a “screw-up” and multiple heads roll, including that of its CTO.

48. Invent!
Scandal breaks out when Newsweek reports that HP responded to leaks from its board by hiring private investigators who obtained the phone records of board members and reporters by claiming to be them–a ruse known as “pretexting.” Before the dust settles, Chairwoman Patricia Dunn and General Counsel Ann Baskins are forced to step down.

49. I shouldn’t mock, I didn’t buy Facebook either.
In September, the Wall Street Journal reports that Yahoo is in talks with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to buy his brainchild (still limited to college students) for a billion dollars. It doesn’t happen. Three years later, still-independent Facebook’s value is estimated at $9.5 billion.

50. Why not the Yahoo or the Mapquest?
During a CNBC interview, President George W. Bush confides that he uses “the Google” to look up maps.

«PREVIOUS PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 NEXT PAGE»

126 Comments

Read more: Apple, Google, Microsoft, Nostalgia

99 Comments For This Post

yashjv Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 12:19 am

Great article. 🙂

SouthBay_Mike Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 1:00 am

Harry, great work as always. The blog is really turning out well! 🙂

Amber Thompson Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 5:32 am

Y2K, most of it was hysteria, in the media.

Zot Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 7:03 am

I’m already disappointed with #1. Saying that Y2K was overhyped resonates with the current H1N1 crisis we are facing. If you prepare for it correctly, there will not be a huge impact. But the reaction that it was a letdown is pure foolishness. Would you prefer if we had prepared less and real trouble befallen the world?

Benj Edwards Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 7:54 am

Man, I remember all of this stuff. Great work, Harry.

Ed Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 8:55 am

I don’t know if it qualifies for this decade; it has its roots in the late 1990s, but most of its public activity was in 2000:

The late, unlamented CueCat!

Backlin Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 9:14 am

The company I used to work for bought a pallet jack from Circuit City; it was the most high-tech purchase that company ever made.

And I remember being very confused when I bought the Apple iPod by HP. And if I remember right, there was HP branding all over iTunes, before Apple built their PC version.

SDS Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 10:05 am

Harry – a few items to point out just reading the summary
1) A decade is a period of 10 years. It doesn’t matter what period that is. However, term usually refers to a period of ten calendar years whose digits are equal up to the tens digit. In that case, 1/1/2000-12/31/2009 would be the standard decade. There are only a select few who refer to the decade as years 1-10.

2) I agree with ZOT… the Y2K Bug was hyped early, properly prepared for, and therefore crisis mostly adverted. I am a programmer and I still come across code today that is infused with the Y2K bug (or something similar, which was used to patch Y2K). It was a patch that was used across many systems, and I am going to call it the Y2.5K bug, as it’s programming will become a catastrophic issue in 40 years. if we prepare for it now, we can survive the world meltdown that is to come from this bug.
Synopsis of this bug: If we enter a two digit year, assume the First two digits to be 19 if it is greater than or equal to 50 and 20 if it is less than 50. Just go into excel and type 12/31/50…. you’ll get 1950’s (however, excel uses the logic of 30, not 50, we we have half the time to solve that issue.

Lazlo St. Pierre Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 12:05 pm

I would have thought the Xbox 360’s Red Ring of Death would have earned a place on a list like this.

MArgy Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 12:47 pm

Awsome, simply awsome. =) I remember Y2K so well…sitting up with my family, waiting for that fatal moment when…nothing happened.

Keep up the good work!

Backlin Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 12:55 pm

The company I used to work for bought a pallet jack from Circuit City; it was the most high-tech purchase that company ever made.And I remember being very confused when I bought the Apple iPod by HP. And if I remember right, there was HP branding all over iTunes, before Apple built their PC version.

azizmoummou Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 2:54 pm

kinda nice blogging…keep going
mine is simple: http;//hellochichaoua.wordpress.com

Go on,
Aziz

John P Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 3:16 pm

@SDS
“There are only a select few who refer to the decade as years 1-10.”

Actually, all official record keeping agencies and historians consider a decade to run from 1-10, a century 1-100, and a millennium 1-1,000. This makes sense because, outside of computer science, when was the last time you started counting at 0?

To illustrate why this is the case, let’s assume that we want to begin a new year system to use instead of our current one with January 1 marking the start of the first year. All dates prior will be referred to as Ancient History (AH) and all after will be the Shining Future (SF).

Once January 1st rolls around, we will have begun our first year – the date will be January 1, 1 SF; but logically the first year does not end until the new one begins. Thus until it is January 1, 2 SF we are still in the first year – not the second. It then follows that when we begin the first year, that we also begin the first decade and the first decade does not end until the 10th year comes to a close on December 31, 10 SF – remember this is when the 10th year ends. Thus the 2nd decade does not begin until January 1, 11 SF. This then also applies to centuries and millenniums.

Why did I start with Year One instead of Year Zero in my example? The answer is because there is and can be no Year Zero. In my example, we arbitrarily start numbering the years from a point in time that we define; once that is established then by definition we are living in Year One SF. What then of the previous year – it becomes Year One AH. Year One AH ends on December 31, 1 AH at 23:59:59 and Year One SF starts on January 1, 1 SF at 00:00:00. There is no point in time where you can point and call it Year Zero, so all numbering begins at Year One – the first year.

So while a decade can be numbered from any year (1995-2004 for example), it is most logical and consistent to start from the first year (1st decade 1-10, 2nd decade 11-20, 3rd decade 21-30, etc). The same holds true for millenniums as well and the 3rd millennium, the 21st century, and the first decade of the century/millennium all started on January 1, 2001. (The fact that people celebrated the “New Millennium” in 2000 just proves that the average person is more interested in big, flashy, round numbers rather than in being logical or consistent.) Thus, the second decade of the 21st century will begin on January 1, 2011.

shad Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 3:49 pm

#88 RieserFS. while working on reiserfs 4, Hans Rieser kills his wife and transports the body in his car. the removes the interior of the car and tells cops he doenst know how it happend. after being conviceted he tell the police where the body is located to avoid the death penalty.

not as cool as y2k.. but still it should have been on the list. much better that stores going bankrupt.

Brian Prince Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 4:46 pm

#73 should read 30 GB not 3 GB.

I was lucky to avoid that bug, and my 1st-generation Zune is still going strong.

Restposten Says:
July 16th, 2011 at 3:48 am

Yes, I had no problems, the overall happiness emerge

Car Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 9:45 pm

Love the Article my favorite blunder was the sony rootkit of 2005 Sony looked like a bunch of d*mb*sses

John Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:21 am

The Samsung Walkman? Did they ever try for that? And the Commodore TRS-80? Why would Commodore ever build a TRS-80 clone when their own machines of the time ruled the market? They didn’t touch the TRS-80 platform once. Or is the joke that both of these would be crazy examples of stuff that would never happen? Very sharp… not far-fetched at all.

Ernst Mulder Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:38 am

“When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don’t know what the heck they’re talking about.”

Well, that kinda hurts.

I was responsible for a newspaper ordering system that definitely would have stopped processing orders in 2000. Cost quite a number of man hours. The majority of the Y2K my team had to solve weren’t for the year 2000 but for passing into the year 1999 because many ordering systems had stupid (year+1) counters internally. It was a very stressful period and I very happy it went the way it did without major disasters.

The experts that didn’t (and don’t) know what they are talking about are the ones thinking you can upper-limit a year counter at 1999 (or 2039).

somebody Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:55 am

The Steorn Orbo should be cited for breaking the laws of theormodynamics, failing in a public demonstration, failing before a jury of their own selection, and then being relaunched with more gusto and blarney.

Slamdunk Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 4:01 am

Ahhh yes, you got to love WebVan.

SJW Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 4:39 am

Hmmm. What about th awful Vista? that was a corker and far more of a flop than say…cutmyfeetoff.

Ruel Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:01 am

ad news on sports and movies for 2010 http://pinoyadcaster.wordpress.com/

Dave Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:13 am

The decade isn’t finished till Dec 1st 2010

Dave Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:25 am

The dumbest comment in Harry’s article:

“If ever a decade began dumb, it was this one.* When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don’t know what the heck they’re talking about.”

It’s precisely because the experts sounded the alarm, and countless programmers and other computer professionals worked for years to fix non-y2k-compliant systems, that the rollover turned out to be a mild irritant.

Your comments are unfairly dismissive of their efforts.

KC Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:35 am

“Gypped” is a racial epithet that’s absolutely as bad as any other slur. This column would never have gone to print with a line like “Consumers felt jewed”, but somehow accusing gypsies of having a thieving nature is just fine.

JussiP Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:53 am

What about Bill Gates’ promise that Microsoft would “totally eliminate” spam in a year or so?

Sean Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:32 am

Clearly you didn’t work in IT before Y2K. Had you, you would know that it was a real and serious issue that took an awful lot of work to fix before Dec 31, 1999.

I didn’t bother reading past the second sentence where you clearly show that you have no business writing about technology at all.

loki_racer Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:42 am

The decade’s dumbest moments have to include every website that still splits up articles on to multiple pages.

Owen Glendower Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:47 am

“(The fact that people celebrated the “New Millennium” in 2000 just proves that the average person is more interested in big, flashy, round numbers rather than in being logical or consistent.)”

That’s the “odometer effect,” as Arthur C. Clarke put it.

kenbo Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:02 am

Not a bad list. I agree that Vista needed more attention: Its the reason Windows 7 got ‘developed’ so quickly.

On another note: The poor sods who are complaining about all the hard work that went into the Y2K changeover… Well show me a system that would have stopped the world as we knew it and I might stop and ponder for a microsecond.

Gypped: KC, are you really into just finding ‘racial’ references?? I suppose you also feel entitled to some compensation as well.

My guess for the coming decade: The e-reader, an underglorified netbook with even less purpose and use with a price tag that’s ridiculous.

AndyB Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:13 am

“Well show me a system that would have stopped the world as we knew it and I might stop and ponder for a microsecond.”

I used to work on credit card systems, particularly those that sent the list of card payments to the acquirers (ie. the banks). The transfer mechanism used by most banks (in the UK at least) was not Y2k compliant, so I had the task of changing it for our company.

So, yes to stopping the world as we know it: imagine paying for things and not having the card company be able to bill you. If we hadn’t fixed that bug, they’d have stopped you paying by CC until it was.

Casey Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:14 am

What about Dell’s exploding laptops?

Mark Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:24 am

Microsoft rushing out the crap Xbox360 just to beat Sony, and ending up with a unreliable mess that needs replacing in 5 years, rather than the PS3s 10yr lifespan.

Spencerg Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:36 am

Not sure if this has been mentioned, but I recall it being a terrible PR blunder by Sony–

“[PS3 is] for consumers to think to themselves ‘I will work more hours to buy one’. We want people to feel that they want it, irrespective of anything else.” — Ken Kutaragi when launching the Sony PS3.

http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-top-30-craziest-industry-quotes/a-20080710101425956052/p-2

Jeff Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:40 am

How about “Plays For Sure” – killing that to make way for the Zune has to be on a failure list.

Elvirus Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:51 am

87 eh? Obviously Harry must be an ARFCOM’er.

OK Harry, what’s you screen name there?

Carina Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:53 am

The biggest tech fail in this decade was KDE 4.0.

najati Says:
July 31st, 2010 at 6:31 pm

I think so too !

johnnie Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:06 am

apparently I found number 88
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090309891%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090309891&RS=DN/20090309891

Microsoft has applied for a patent to make avatars look more like a persons actual physical appearence. This alone is good. They also want to limit a persons game play if they are considered unhealthy (fat). As a late thirties 280 pound man, I am going to be very pissed and canceling my live 360 if my game system tells me to take a run around the block.

Brian Jones Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:28 am

I was well aware of the potential for the Y2K bug, and how much effort was put into abatement prior to the end of 1999 – I worked for a large communications equipment supplier at the time.

Another memory is when I was sitting with my younger son having dinner and we were talking about the Y2K bug. A young lady was sitting near us, and I could see her antennas were up. I started talking about how much ammunition I had purchased, as well as all of the food stores I had laid aside. About the time she started to wonder if I was certifiable, I turned to her and admitted that all I had done was to grab an extra $200.00 from an ATM.

erewhon Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:06 am

What about the Satyam outsourcing scandal – http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7818220.stm

Or the failure of the entire malware, anti-virus and operating system industry to remove Spam or malware from the internets, pipes and home PCs?

Al Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:18 am

Regarding the demise of Polaroid…

http://www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2009/12/features/the-impossible-project-reviving-instant-photography.aspx?page=all

krygny Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:53 am

I see you found many stupid things said about technology by Republicans. Not one by a Democrat.

HACK!!

Francesco Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:08 am

What about Microsoft BOB? Or how a whole OS could be based on the Office assistant. The “canine companion” of XP is just a spinoff of BOB, a wonderful idea: having all the OS replaced by an intelligent guy, as intelligent as Word’s Clippy and the XP “retriever”.
The fact that Bill Gates wife designed it is just a part of the reason..

Rich Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:36 am

Windows 7 launch parties

Taco Lover Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:45 am

Well about 83…
In fact Taco Bell does not produce tacos. At least not as we know them in the country of Mexico.
I have absolutely no idea what is their food called, I guess they had to call it something anyhow.

Zeno Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:07 am

I haven’t the least problem with the Zero Decade. After all, 2000 to 2009 is definitely a ten-year period. I’m fussier about designations for centuries, however. The 19th century really should include 1900 and the 20th century should include 2000. I don’t even care that much about the “no Year Zero” argument because our Common Era reckoning didn’t come into use until centuries later. It’s pretty arbitrary how we choose to mark time. For me, however, it’s a matter of cheating a designated century of its capstone year.

labrats5 Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:17 am

I nominate the N-gage platform by Nokia and the sixAxis controller from Sony

v.dog Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:24 am

I know you’ve got to be selective with these lists but there’s two more you should have had:

EA’s Spore (and Mass Effect) DRM debacle and 3D Realms shutting down after working on Duke Nukem (is taking) Forever for 12 years.

Rifter Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am

Great article, but I have to take exception with #1 as many others have. I was a developer at that time, and also helped fix Y2K bugs. I also remember all of the Y2K compliance testing we had to do on new items. It wasn’t a big problem, because of the astronomical man-hours that were used to keep it from being a big problem. I know I stocked up on several cases of water, JUST in case.

Along with the Xbox 360 Red Ring of Death, I think I would toss in the NES blowing on the pins fix, the PS1 flipping it over on its top trick, and the PS2’s problem where many, MANY first gen units just ceased to read DVDs.

Though, I think the 360 and PS2 are probably the 2 biggest of that list.

Stitch Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am

Overall, a fairly mediocre listing.

mulaz Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am

Win7 launch party!! (dont forget too look at the clock on the stove) 🙂

Chad Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:54 am

Great read! My favorite is, by far, the windows/family guy joke! Seth probably didn’t negotiate it, but MS HAD to know what they were getting into! It’s so choice!

M Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:32 pm

Wow, this is a seriously good piece of literature. It really goes to show that even though the big corporations hide behind their fancy logos, catchy phrases, and expensive ad campaigns all designed to create a perception of wisdom and innovation, behind the scenes they struggle to understand consumers and where technology is taking us.

‘Wired’ only wishes it were savvy enough to write something this good, but it’s not. This article has severely affected my productivity for the day. Good thing I’m paid by the hour….

HamNCheese Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:35 pm

> On September 14th, Microsoft releases Windows Millennium Edition (aka Windows Me).

IN THE YEAR 2000…

cshapiro Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 2:13 pm

Gametap.com launches with great fanfare in October 2005.
After burning through perhaps as much as $60 * 10^6 in development and promotion costs, Time Warner (TBS)’s gametap.com is sold to a French video gaming company for $6 * 10^6 in Sep 2008. After the sale, subscribers using Apple computers find that they can no longer use the service. Gamers everywhere yawn.

John Doe Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:10 pm

And hot from the press, Verizon’s latest dick move to shove Microsoft’s Bing into their BlackBerry users’ faces: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/19/verizon_snuffs_google_for_bing/

Peter da Silva Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:21 pm

The y2k problem was a snoozer because a LOT of geeks worked a LOT of hours in 1998 and 1999 to fix the problem before it happened. I was in a y2k war room and when midnight passed our first customer without the lights going out in Canberra (our product was controlling the Snowy Mountains Project electrical grid) we all cheered.

Outside the y2k war rooms of thousands of companies whose software was supporting the world’s industrial base, nobody heard that cheer, but we damn well won that war before the first (potential) shot was fired.

Harry McCracken Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:25 pm

I agree that Y2K was a snoozer not because there wasn’t a problem, but because we (and by we, I mean the geeks charged with solving things) fixed it in time. The item’s not on the list because people worried, it’s there because of the people who were positive that apocalypse was imminent…

–Harry

Arby Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:33 pm

I dont get the people arguing that there’s no year zero. Yes there is. When you’re born, you’re not instantly 1! You start from nothing and count up to 1 year completed, and so forth. 10 marks a 10 years completed. Make sense?

Sean Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:11 pm

Come on Harry, now you’re just trying to save face.

..”people who were positive that apocalypse was imminent” has nothing to do with what you’ve written here. This was an embarrassing attempt to undermine “experts” using your lack of knowledge about the events surrounding the Y2K bug and its repair.

Shenanigans!

Nameless Wonder Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:17 pm

Guys and gals, about the Y2K issue: Harry is NOT saying that is was not much of a problem to fix, he’s talking about predictions of “widespread starvation, utility failures, medical emergencies, and financial catastroph”, which obviously did not happen.

Because the problem was addressed, indeed.

Personally, I remember being a bit frustrated by the irrational talk of various kinds of mayhem and things that might happen, invariably by people that had no meaningful understanding of the inner workings of computer systems, which includes pretty much all “normal” non-IT folk. I mean no offense, this is just how it is (most of the Hollywood movies and TV shows that have anything to do with computers are certainly not helping here). I think this category also includes some newscasters, journalists and editors and such, hence the news predictions of disaster…

The professionals in the meantime did what needed to be done – mission accomplished, job well done. In Harry’s words “the world has addressed the Y2K problem remarkably well”. So consider yourselves acknowledged. 🙂

Henry Wood Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 10:45 am

Great Blog. Keep up the great work.

IT Professional Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 11:00 am

I worked for a major airline, and we spent two years running up to 2000 checking every single system we owned for Y2K compliance. Where they had been provided by third parties, if they were unable to certify that their system was Y2K compliant, we looked for a replacement system, or planned for workaround processes that could be put in place

We found and fixed date-related bugs in flight booking, passenger tracking, baggage handling, ground operations, crew rostering, maintenance scheduling, procurement and warehouse systems.

We set up an operations room that ramped up as the end of 1999 approached, until it had 24-hour coverage by the end of the year. Every team had staff on call over the change-over.

It was this level of effort and attention to detail by IT professionals in every industry that allowed us to manage the effect of many years of non-Y2K compliant code. Your comments show you have no understanding of the work done by real IT professionals.

Harry McCracken Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 11:30 am

Sorry, IT Professional, but I understand the problem and am well aware of all the work that went into fixing Y2K.

That’s why I said that it turned out the world’s response turned out to be good (not that there was nothing worth worrying about).

That’s why I said that the problems turned out to be largely minor when January 1st came around (not that there weren’t serious issues beforehand).

You seem to be upset about an item I didn’t write, in which I maintain that the Y2K bug didn’t need to be fixed. Or that those responsible for for fixing it did a crummy job. Or something.

Once again, my point was this: A lot of “experts” got attention and money by confidently predicting epic disaster starting on January 1st, 2000. Their predictions were lame–because you and your colleagues and everyone else responsible for solving things had the issue in hand. Is it just possible that my item is a compliment to the people who addressed Y2K rather than an insult?

–Harry

Francesco Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 1:00 pm

>> Is it just possible that my item is a compliment to the people who addressed Y2K rather than an insult?

Mmmm… No. Really not.

I mean, the “predictions were lame” because “someone confidently predicting epic disaster” convinced all the others to fix it. The disater was avoided not only by the techical guys that fixed it, but also by the panicking non technicals that scared everyone until eventually all got tested hundred times.

Duggeek Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 1:19 pm

So… to round it up to 90, we just need to add:

1. Xbox 360 “Red Ring of Death” affects around 40% of the devices sold.
(Really… what’s NOT lame about that!?)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_technical_problems

2. Microsoft wildly inflates Vista sales figures in an attempt to save face.
(Post-rationalization meets impatience meets out-and-out lies)
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/vista/stacking_vista_licenses_too_high.html

3. Dell laptops begin to ignite, explode because of shoddy batteries.
(Dude, get down! You got a Dell!)
http://explodinglaptop.com/
…that’s right, someone made a dedicated site for this phenomenon. That alone should be reason to include it on this almighty list.

Switching gears to address the list as-is:

Oh the blessed fail that is #17 (Microsoft “companions”) to properly portray it, you should have a separate listing for each Microsoft product that used these unholy creations. (XP, Office, DevStudio, even Server)

So you have #36, but it’s about Google and not Video Professor? I agree that the Web Accelerator deserves a spot, but Video Professor does too! How about the class-action suit about deceptive sales practices, particularly in the “virtual currency” offers within certain Facebook apps?
Here’s the scoop…
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/video-professor-washington-post-scamville/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29

What’s not mentioned in #67 (Windows Mojave) is what makes that such a lame effort on the part of Microsoft. Of course people are impressed by watching a demonstration! Of course people are going to go “ooh” and “aah” for the shiny new Aero interface! What they don’t show are how these people are regularly disappointed about UAC confusion, buggy device support and more-than-typical crashes during regular use. All that the “Mojave experiment” could prove was that Microsoft is fully capable of polishing the fail-turd to a spectacular shine.

I like that #87 (Misfit Toys commercial) mentions the failure of AT&T to act upon a competitor’s advertising. Verizon issued a brilliant ad-campaign with “the map”. If you want to add more on this, just keep counting the number of “backlash” AT&T commercials featuring a past-prime Luke Wilson touting- well… nothing. Analyze the claims from the Luke Wilson commercials and you’ll get nothing more than the sales propaganda AT&T has been spouting all along. (I don’t care how fast their 3G is; but does it work where I’m standing right now?) Moreover, none of the ads refute Verizon’s claims in the slightest; they’re all smoke-and-mirrors hogwash.

Still, it’s a great list. Well done. I’d nearly forgotten about some of those—like the Foleo—and like many, just kept rolling forward with “what works.”

Randall Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 3:54 pm

RE Webvan; AmazonFresh is running strong here in Seattle and it’s a fantastic service! I just had some Christmas presents and groceries delivered last night.

Also the HP/iPod hybrid was back when Apple was only making Mac versions of the iPod. That was their first attempt at a PC version of the iPod. I guess they assumed that some PC users wouldn’t realize that they could use an Apple product with their PC.

Paul Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 5:38 pm

What about Steve, the Dell Dude, hawking Dell PC’s with the line, ‘Dude, you’re getting a Dell!’. It worked at first, lifting Dell to #1. Then disaster struck, poor customer service, class-action lawsuits for ‘bait-and-switch’ tactics, and finally, exploding laptops. Dell dropped to #3, easily the biggest technology flame-out of the decade. To top it all off, Steve was charged in NY with possession, never appearing in a Dell ad again.

Paul Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 5:45 pm

What about Steve, the Dell Dude? He hawked Dell PC’s with the line, ‘Dude, you’re getting a Dell!’ It helped raise Dell to #1. Then, disaster struck, with customer service complaints, class action lawsuits for ‘bait-and-switch’ sales tactics, and exploding laptops. Dell dropped to #3 — easily the biggest technology flame-out of the decade! To top it off, Steve was more of a Dude than we knew, arrested in NY for possession, never to do another Dell ad again.

steve Says:
December 24th, 2009 at 2:58 pm

Zot is an idiot

John Smith Says:
December 25th, 2009 at 7:42 am

Missed Snow Leopard letting guest accounts delete everything on the hard drive.
Oh wait. It is Apple so that is not a bug it is part of “The world’s most advanced OS” which has just been certified as UNIX.

Karey Says:
December 25th, 2009 at 10:43 am

No Windows 7 house party ads?

Backlight Says:
December 26th, 2009 at 6:03 am

Bill Says:
December 26th, 2009 at 11:55 pm

E-Machine … That is all .

mdr410 Says:
December 27th, 2009 at 2:31 pm

awesome! thanks for putting this together!

Y2K was real Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 5:43 am

Y2K remediation efforts in the years leading up to the year 2000 are the reason why widespread Y2K-related problems were avoided.

Companies that did not do Y2K remediation were impacted by the problem, and their Y2K problems became the problems of their business partners. For example, a PTT in the Pacific Basin that our company and scores of other international IXCs had reverse charge billing arrangements with did not make its systems Y2K-compliant by 1/1/2000. When it produced its January bills, it discovered they were screwed up specifically as a consequence of its systems’ non-Y2K compliance. Furthermore, the PTT was unable to provide correct reverse charge billing data to our company and to other international carriers for the same reason. Typically we billed approximately 4,000 collect calls a month that originated from that PTT’s customers. Worldwide, there were tens of thousands of international collect and calling card calls originating from this PTT — all unbillable owing to its screwed up CDRs and billing records. It wasn’t until August 2000 that the PTT fixed its systems and was able to bill customers again and provide international carriers with correct reverse charge billing data.

chunky Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 8:31 pm

How ’bout the blue screen of death that was projected onto the ceiling of the Chinese Olympic stadium?

Bill Walsh Says:
December 29th, 2009 at 8:26 am

The TRS-80 wasn’t a Commodore. It was from Tandy/Radio Shack. You’re thinking of the VIC-20.

Anthony Nonymous Says:
December 29th, 2009 at 6:43 pm

THE number ONE Lame Moment in Tech, with the greatest consequences, was the hacking of voting machines, resulting in the thefts of the 2000 US Presidential Election (particularly in Florida), and again in 2004 (particularly in Ohio)

Ray Says:
December 30th, 2009 at 12:01 am

Yeah…the Y2K bug…funny how its so much like what the man made global warming issue is today. Soon the truth will be realized that is it a big hoax.

Max Says:
December 30th, 2009 at 10:46 am

Here are 2 dumb tech moments by #1 and #2 Democrats:

1. Gordon Brown presents Obama a pen holder carved from the timbers of HMS Gannett, a sister ship of HMS Resolute; the commissioning certificate of HMS Resolute; and a seven-volume biography of Winston Churchill. In return, the Prime minister gets 25 DVDS, which don’t work in Britain.

2. Joe Biden forgets the “website number” for the White House internet site designed to show how TARP money is being spent.

simpletechguru Says:
December 30th, 2009 at 12:43 pm

Wow! This must have taken forever to write! Great list and lots of fun. Hindsight IS 20-20…but let us look at our history lest we repeat it again and again and again.

Thanks!

Phil Ant Says:
December 31st, 2009 at 12:59 am

@Anthony Nonymous:

Tell me, how do you hack MANUAL voting machines? Y’know, those that were used in FL in the ’00 election? The ones where you make a selection beforehand then PULL A FREAKIN’ LEVER?

Reduziert Says:
February 10th, 2010 at 1:18 am

The “Monkey Boy” video is always awesome, no matter how often you watch it 🙂

Moran Says:
April 20th, 2010 at 7:43 am

Nice Post, I would like to add one more dumbest thing OR you can say its the champion of the Dumbest thing contest.. The ugly red ring of death.. Last month I came across this problem with my xbox 360 and its the nightmare for me. Though I had repaired my xbox red ring of death problem by following guide but its not the permanent solution.

Do you guys have any permanent solution for this deadly red ring of death?

PC Boxen Says:
August 3rd, 2010 at 12:58 am

i laughed hard 😀 amazing moments

Best wallpapers Says:
October 10th, 2010 at 12:03 am

This is very intresting, You are a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post.

Nadine Says:
October 28th, 2010 at 4:41 pm

[…]this dumb decade […]

James Billig Says:
November 18th, 2010 at 7:00 am

For me Windows ME really was an all time low, completely useless piece of code and software.

dreambox dm600 pvr Says:
December 7th, 2010 at 12:03 am

The company I used to work for bought a pallet jack from Circuit City; it was the most high-tech purchase that company ever made.

And I remember being very confused when I bought the Apple iPod by HP. And if I remember right, there was HP branding all over iTunes, before Apple built their PC version.

aircraft parts Says:
December 20th, 2010 at 12:10 am

I have you bookmarked your web site to check out the brand new stuff you post.Should you're keen on having a visitor weblog poster please reply and let me know. I will give you unique content in your website, thanks.

xboxringofdeathfix Says:
January 25th, 2011 at 11:12 pm

What is SJW saying i wonder?

Existenzgründung Says:
March 5th, 2011 at 10:05 am

I still like Balmer going crazy. One of the best videos 😉

Jamaica Airport Says:
May 8th, 2011 at 3:38 am

As I web site possessor I believe the content material here is rattling wonderful , appreciate it for your efforts. You should keep it up forever! Good Luck.

watch wwe Says:
May 8th, 2011 at 3:39 am

Great ¡V I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs as well as related information ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, web site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Nice task..

road rash iso Says:
May 8th, 2011 at 3:40 am

Valuable information. Fortunate me I found your website accidentally, and I am shocked why this accident didn't happened earlier! I bookmarked it.

Jalisa Zakar Says:
June 30th, 2011 at 11:40 am

Hey I am so excited I found your website https://www.technologizer.com/2009/12/20/dumb-moments, I really found you by mistake, while I was searching on Askjeeve for something else, Regardless I am here now and would just like to say thank you for a marvelous post and an all round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the moment but I have saved it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the superb job.

27 Trackbacks For This Post

10 random things to learn on December 22nd | Nilesh Babu Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:02 am

[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 If ever a decade began dumb, it was this one.* When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don’t know what the heck they’re talking about. […]

The 87 Lamest Moments In Tech, 2000-2009 | JetLib News Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:53 am

[…] writes “The last ten years have been an amazing era for tech — and full of amazingly dumb moments. I rounded up scads of them. I suspect you’ll be able to figure out which company is most […]

This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 « andinspired Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 4:30 am

[…] Technology Leave a Comment Tags: collection, dumb, google, microsoft, tech, windows Nice collection of dumb moments in tech over the last 10 […]

أغبى 87 تعليق على التكنولوجيا من 2000 حتى 2009 | Technology & Science Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:23 am

[…] أغبى 87 تعليق على التكنولوجيا من 2000 حتى 2009 […]

This Decade’s dumbest tech moments « Currently Nameless Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:38 am

[…] You can find the article here: https://www.technologizer.com/2009/12/20/dumb-moments/ […]

The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 @ AskWoody.com Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:43 am

[…] McCracken (who knows more than a bit about lame – hi, Harry!) has a funtastic list in Technologizer going through the 87 lamest moments from January 1, 2000 to […]

The Decade`s 87 Lamest Moments in Tech | Utter Oddness | Surge Bucket Media Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:16 am

[…] Link: Read more […]

Windows ME? On the list. | MANGOAT DOT NET Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:36 am

[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 | Technologizer. This entry was written by Mangoat, posted on December 22, 2009 at 8:48 am, and filed under HELP COMPUTER, Space and Tech. « Dressed up as a superhero as a kid? This is the blog for you. Who saw this coming? » […]

This dumb decade | Big Lazy SysAdmin Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 1:44 pm

[…] Slashdot, cele mai stupide 87 de momente din industria IT petrecute între anii […]

Funny as hell « Student Life and Relationships Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:51 pm

[…] This Dumb Decade: 87 Dumbest Moments in Tech, 2000 – 2009 […]

Top Posts — WordPress.com Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 4:14 pm

[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 If ever a decade began dumb, it was this one.* When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug […] […]

FOI Topics and Links of the Week :: The Future of the Internet — And How to Stop It Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 7:34 am

[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009. Not so much the future of the internet, but the recent past. Many of the recent lame moments have been covered in this blog (Danger Sidekick phones lose users’ data for weeks; Apple rejects Google Voice; Amazon removes 1984 from the Kindle). The old stuff is fun. I didn’t know that Facebook donated $9.5 million to a privacy-education foundation after the Beacon fiasco. […]

Los peores 87 momentos tecnológicos de la década [ENG] Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 11:13 am

[…] Los peores 87 momentos tecnológicos de la década [ENG] technologizer.com/2009/12/20/dumb-moments por SantiH hace pocos segundos […]

aktuelle Netznachrichten 2009-12-23 : VitoNet Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 1:49 pm

[…] Die dümmsten IT-Tech-Momente des Jahrzehnts (bei technologizer) […]

Apple, Pong, Irrtümer, 2009 und mehr > News, Tipps > 2009, Apple, Ballmer, Irrtümer, Pong Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 8:12 am

[…] Tech Irrtümer und Peinlichkeiten Auf technologizer.com gibt es eine Liste von 87 Dingen, die im Technologie-Bereich von 2000 bis 2009 schief gegangen sind […]

The Shoddy Aughties: Best of the Decade's Worst Lists » The ENGINE Blog » ENGINE Industries, Atlanta Web Design Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 3:23 pm

[…] 87 Lamest Moments by Technologizer […]

Links 12/29/2009 Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 11:30 pm

[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 | Technologizer […]

Les tops de l’année 2009. | Alban Badger Says:
December 29th, 2009 at 9:06 pm

[…] pessimistes, Technologizer revient sur 87 évènements qui font de cette décénie la plus bête (Dumb Decade)… L’occasion de voir les différents errements des grandes compagnies, comme Apple et […]

You Like Lists, Do You? Here Are Fifty of ‘em | Technologizer Says:
December 31st, 2009 at 11:23 am

[…] The decade's 87 lamest moments […]

Podcast Ep 119 – Last Show of the Decade! - Geekazine 2010 Says:
January 2nd, 2010 at 5:31 pm

[…] went the last 10 years and where Geekazine is going for the next 10. The One Thing Apple Did Wrong 87 Dumb Moments Ubuntu Looks like Windows […]

10 Dumb Technologies You Don't Want In 2010 | New Technology and Cool Gadgets Says:
January 2nd, 2010 at 9:51 pm

[…] count on one (actually two) hand. If you can’t get enough of dummies, I suggest you hop over here for a recap of goofy technologies in the past decade. December 25th, 2009 in Technology | tags: […]

Links for December 16th through January 4th – eclecticism Says:
January 4th, 2010 at 10:02 am

[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009: "If ever a decade began dumb, it was this one. When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don't know what the heck they're talking about." […]

This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 | Videos,News,Softwares,TV Shows and much more Says:
March 20th, 2010 at 7:51 am

[…] https://www.technologizer.com/2009/12/20/dumb-moments/ […]

This Dumb Year: The 57 Lamest Tech Moments of 2010 Says:
December 21st, 2010 at 1:33 am

[…] the industry’s lame moments are…well, lame, they can also be important. Last year, I summed up a decade’s worth of tech screw-ups and came up with 87 examples. This time around, I’m covering only a single year–but I […]

This Dumb Year: The 57 Lamest Tech Moments of 2010 | Hot Electronics Trends Says:
December 23rd, 2010 at 7:26 am

[…] that while the industry’s lame moments are…well, lame, they can also be important. Last year, I summed up a decade’s worth of tech screw-ups and came up with 87 examples. This time around, I’m covering only a single year–but I found 57 […]

Bad Tech « Ed Parnell's Cunning Plan Says:
December 25th, 2010 at 11:21 pm

Averting Disaster | Quiet Babylon Says:
March 18th, 2011 at 8:23 pm

[…] at the end of the decade, the Y2K story has been reduced to the status of overblown hoax. Which raises the question: How would […]

yashjv Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 12:19 am
Great article. 🙂
SouthBay_Mike Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 1:00 am
Harry, great work as always. The blog is really turning out well! 🙂
Amber Thompson Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 5:32 am
Y2K, most of it was hysteria, in the media.
Zot Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 7:03 am
I’m already disappointed with #1. Saying that Y2K was overhyped resonates with the current H1N1 crisis we are facing. If you prepare for it correctly, there will not be a huge impact. But the reaction that it was a letdown is pure foolishness. Would you prefer if we had prepared less and real trouble befallen the world?
Benj Edwards Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 7:54 am
Man, I remember all of this stuff. Great work, Harry.
Ed Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 8:55 am
I don’t know if it qualifies for this decade; it has its roots in the late 1990s, but most of its public activity was in 2000:

The late, unlamented CueCat!
Backlin Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 9:14 am
The company I used to work for bought a pallet jack from Circuit City; it was the most high-tech purchase that company ever made.

And I remember being very confused when I bought the Apple iPod by HP. And if I remember right, there was HP branding all over iTunes, before Apple built their PC version.
SDS Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 10:05 am
Harry – a few items to point out just reading the summary
1) A decade is a period of 10 years. It doesn’t matter what period that is. However, term usually refers to a period of ten calendar years whose digits are equal up to the tens digit. In that case, 1/1/2000-12/31/2009 would be the standard decade. There are only a select few who refer to the decade as years 1-10.

2) I agree with ZOT… the Y2K Bug was hyped early, properly prepared for, and therefore crisis mostly adverted. I am a programmer and I still come across code today that is infused with the Y2K bug (or something similar, which was used to patch Y2K). It was a patch that was used across many systems, and I am going to call it the Y2.5K bug, as it’s programming will become a catastrophic issue in 40 years. if we prepare for it now, we can survive the world meltdown that is to come from this bug.
Synopsis of this bug: If we enter a two digit year, assume the First two digits to be 19 if it is greater than or equal to 50 and 20 if it is less than 50. Just go into excel and type 12/31/50…. you’ll get 1950’s (however, excel uses the logic of 30, not 50, we we have half the time to solve that issue.
Lazlo St. Pierre Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 12:05 pm
I would have thought the Xbox 360’s Red Ring of Death would have earned a place on a list like this.
MArgy Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 12:47 pm
Awsome, simply awsome. =) I remember Y2K so well…sitting up with my family, waiting for that fatal moment when…nothing happened.

Keep up the good work!
Backlin Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 12:55 pm
The company I used to work for bought a pallet jack from Circuit City; it was the most high-tech purchase that company ever made.And I remember being very confused when I bought the Apple iPod by HP. And if I remember right, there was HP branding all over iTunes, before Apple built their PC version.
azizmoummou Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 2:54 pm
kinda nice blogging…keep going
mine is simple: http;//hellochichaoua.wordpress.com

Go on,
Aziz
John P Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 3:16 pm
@SDS
“There are only a select few who refer to the decade as years 1-10.”

Actually, all official record keeping agencies and historians consider a decade to run from 1-10, a century 1-100, and a millennium 1-1,000. This makes sense because, outside of computer science, when was the last time you started counting at 0?

To illustrate why this is the case, let’s assume that we want to begin a new year system to use instead of our current one with January 1 marking the start of the first year. All dates prior will be referred to as Ancient History (AH) and all after will be the Shining Future (SF).

Once January 1st rolls around, we will have begun our first year – the date will be January 1, 1 SF; but logically the first year does not end until the new one begins. Thus until it is January 1, 2 SF we are still in the first year – not the second. It then follows that when we begin the first year, that we also begin the first decade and the first decade does not end until the 10th year comes to a close on December 31, 10 SF – remember this is when the 10th year ends. Thus the 2nd decade does not begin until January 1, 11 SF. This then also applies to centuries and millenniums.

Why did I start with Year One instead of Year Zero in my example? The answer is because there is and can be no Year Zero. In my example, we arbitrarily start numbering the years from a point in time that we define; once that is established then by definition we are living in Year One SF. What then of the previous year – it becomes Year One AH. Year One AH ends on December 31, 1 AH at 23:59:59 and Year One SF starts on January 1, 1 SF at 00:00:00. There is no point in time where you can point and call it Year Zero, so all numbering begins at Year One – the first year.

So while a decade can be numbered from any year (1995-2004 for example), it is most logical and consistent to start from the first year (1st decade 1-10, 2nd decade 11-20, 3rd decade 21-30, etc). The same holds true for millenniums as well and the 3rd millennium, the 21st century, and the first decade of the century/millennium all started on January 1, 2001. (The fact that people celebrated the “New Millennium” in 2000 just proves that the average person is more interested in big, flashy, round numbers rather than in being logical or consistent.) Thus, the second decade of the 21st century will begin on January 1, 2011.
shad Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 3:49 pm
#88 RieserFS. while working on reiserfs 4, Hans Rieser kills his wife and transports the body in his car. the removes the interior of the car and tells cops he doenst know how it happend. after being conviceted he tell the police where the body is located to avoid the death penalty.

not as cool as y2k.. but still it should have been on the list. much better that stores going bankrupt.
Brian Prince Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 4:46 pm
#73 should read 30 GB not 3 GB.

I was lucky to avoid that bug, and my 1st-generation Zune is still going strong.
Restposten Says:
July 16th, 2011 at 3:48 am
Yes, I had no problems, the overall happiness emerge
Car Says:
December 21st, 2009 at 9:45 pm
Love the Article my favorite blunder was the sony rootkit of 2005 Sony looked like a bunch of d*mb*sses
John Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:21 am
The Samsung Walkman? Did they ever try for that? And the Commodore TRS-80? Why would Commodore ever build a TRS-80 clone when their own machines of the time ruled the market? They didn’t touch the TRS-80 platform once. Or is the joke that both of these would be crazy examples of stuff that would never happen? Very sharp… not far-fetched at all.
Ernst Mulder Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:38 am
“When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don’t know what the heck they’re talking about.”

Well, that kinda hurts.

I was responsible for a newspaper ordering system that definitely would have stopped processing orders in 2000. Cost quite a number of man hours. The majority of the Y2K my team had to solve weren’t for the year 2000 but for passing into the year 1999 because many ordering systems had stupid (year+1) counters internally. It was a very stressful period and I very happy it went the way it did without major disasters.

The experts that didn’t (and don’t) know what they are talking about are the ones thinking you can upper-limit a year counter at 1999 (or 2039).
somebody Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:55 am
The Steorn Orbo should be cited for breaking the laws of theormodynamics, failing in a public demonstration, failing before a jury of their own selection, and then being relaunched with more gusto and blarney.
Slamdunk Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 4:01 am
Ahhh yes, you got to love WebVan.
SJW Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 4:39 am
Hmmm. What about th awful Vista? that was a corker and far more of a flop than say…cutmyfeetoff.
Ruel Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:01 am
ad news on sports and movies for 2010 http://pinoyadcaster.wordpress.com/
Dave Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:13 am
The decade isn’t finished till Dec 1st 2010
Dave Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:25 am
The dumbest comment in Harry’s article:

“If ever a decade began dumb, it was this one.* When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don’t know what the heck they’re talking about.”

It’s precisely because the experts sounded the alarm, and countless programmers and other computer professionals worked for years to fix non-y2k-compliant systems, that the rollover turned out to be a mild irritant.

Your comments are unfairly dismissive of their efforts.
KC Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:35 am
“Gypped” is a racial epithet that’s absolutely as bad as any other slur. This column would never have gone to print with a line like “Consumers felt jewed”, but somehow accusing gypsies of having a thieving nature is just fine.
JussiP Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:53 am
What about Bill Gates’ promise that Microsoft would “totally eliminate” spam in a year or so?
Sean Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:32 am
Clearly you didn’t work in IT before Y2K. Had you, you would know that it was a real and serious issue that took an awful lot of work to fix before Dec 31, 1999.

I didn’t bother reading past the second sentence where you clearly show that you have no business writing about technology at all.
loki_racer Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:42 am
The decade’s dumbest moments have to include every website that still splits up articles on to multiple pages.
Owen Glendower Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 6:47 am
“(The fact that people celebrated the “New Millennium” in 2000 just proves that the average person is more interested in big, flashy, round numbers rather than in being logical or consistent.)”

That’s the “odometer effect,” as Arthur C. Clarke put it.
kenbo Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:02 am
Not a bad list. I agree that Vista needed more attention: Its the reason Windows 7 got ‘developed’ so quickly.

On another note: The poor sods who are complaining about all the hard work that went into the Y2K changeover… Well show me a system that would have stopped the world as we knew it and I might stop and ponder for a microsecond.

Gypped: KC, are you really into just finding ‘racial’ references?? I suppose you also feel entitled to some compensation as well.

My guess for the coming decade: The e-reader, an underglorified netbook with even less purpose and use with a price tag that’s ridiculous.
AndyB Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:13 am
“Well show me a system that would have stopped the world as we knew it and I might stop and ponder for a microsecond.”

I used to work on credit card systems, particularly those that sent the list of card payments to the acquirers (ie. the banks). The transfer mechanism used by most banks (in the UK at least) was not Y2k compliant, so I had the task of changing it for our company.

So, yes to stopping the world as we know it: imagine paying for things and not having the card company be able to bill you. If we hadn’t fixed that bug, they’d have stopped you paying by CC until it was.
Casey Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:14 am
What about Dell’s exploding laptops?
Mark Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:24 am
Microsoft rushing out the crap Xbox360 just to beat Sony, and ending up with a unreliable mess that needs replacing in 5 years, rather than the PS3s 10yr lifespan.
Spencerg Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:36 am
Not sure if this has been mentioned, but I recall it being a terrible PR blunder by Sony–

“[PS3 is] for consumers to think to themselves ‘I will work more hours to buy one’. We want people to feel that they want it, irrespective of anything else.” — Ken Kutaragi when launching the Sony PS3.

http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-top-30-craziest-industry-quotes/a-20080710101425956052/p-2
Jeff Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:40 am
How about “Plays For Sure” – killing that to make way for the Zune has to be on a failure list.
Elvirus Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:51 am
87 eh? Obviously Harry must be an ARFCOM’er.

OK Harry, what’s you screen name there?
Carina Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:53 am
The biggest tech fail in this decade was KDE 4.0.
najati Says:
July 31st, 2010 at 6:31 pm
I think so too !
johnnie Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:06 am
apparently I found number 88
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220090309891%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20090309891&RS=DN/20090309891

Microsoft has applied for a patent to make avatars look more like a persons actual physical appearence. This alone is good. They also want to limit a persons game play if they are considered unhealthy (fat). As a late thirties 280 pound man, I am going to be very pissed and canceling my live 360 if my game system tells me to take a run around the block.
Brian Jones Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:28 am
I was well aware of the potential for the Y2K bug, and how much effort was put into abatement prior to the end of 1999 – I worked for a large communications equipment supplier at the time.

Another memory is when I was sitting with my younger son having dinner and we were talking about the Y2K bug. A young lady was sitting near us, and I could see her antennas were up. I started talking about how much ammunition I had purchased, as well as all of the food stores I had laid aside. About the time she started to wonder if I was certifiable, I turned to her and admitted that all I had done was to grab an extra $200.00 from an ATM.
erewhon Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:06 am
What about the Satyam outsourcing scandal – http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7818220.stm

Or the failure of the entire malware, anti-virus and operating system industry to remove Spam or malware from the internets, pipes and home PCs?
Al Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:18 am
Regarding the demise of Polaroid…

http://www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2009/12/features/the-impossible-project-reviving-instant-photography.aspx?page=all
krygny Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:53 am
I see you found many stupid things said about technology by Republicans. Not one by a Democrat.

HACK!!
Francesco Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:08 am
What about Microsoft BOB? Or how a whole OS could be based on the Office assistant. The “canine companion” of XP is just a spinoff of BOB, a wonderful idea: having all the OS replaced by an intelligent guy, as intelligent as Word’s Clippy and the XP “retriever”.
The fact that Bill Gates wife designed it is just a part of the reason..
Rich Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:36 am
Windows 7 launch parties
Taco Lover Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:45 am
Well about 83…
In fact Taco Bell does not produce tacos. At least not as we know them in the country of Mexico.
I have absolutely no idea what is their food called, I guess they had to call it something anyhow.
Zeno Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:07 am
I haven’t the least problem with the Zero Decade. After all, 2000 to 2009 is definitely a ten-year period. I’m fussier about designations for centuries, however. The 19th century really should include 1900 and the 20th century should include 2000. I don’t even care that much about the “no Year Zero” argument because our Common Era reckoning didn’t come into use until centuries later. It’s pretty arbitrary how we choose to mark time. For me, however, it’s a matter of cheating a designated century of its capstone year.
labrats5 Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:17 am
I nominate the N-gage platform by Nokia and the sixAxis controller from Sony
v.dog Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:24 am
I know you’ve got to be selective with these lists but there’s two more you should have had:

EA’s Spore (and Mass Effect) DRM debacle and 3D Realms shutting down after working on Duke Nukem (is taking) Forever for 12 years.
Rifter Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am
Great article, but I have to take exception with #1 as many others have. I was a developer at that time, and also helped fix Y2K bugs. I also remember all of the Y2K compliance testing we had to do on new items. It wasn’t a big problem, because of the astronomical man-hours that were used to keep it from being a big problem. I know I stocked up on several cases of water, JUST in case.

Along with the Xbox 360 Red Ring of Death, I think I would toss in the NES blowing on the pins fix, the PS1 flipping it over on its top trick, and the PS2’s problem where many, MANY first gen units just ceased to read DVDs.

Though, I think the 360 and PS2 are probably the 2 biggest of that list.
Stitch Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am
Overall, a fairly mediocre listing.
mulaz Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:32 am
Win7 launch party!! (dont forget too look at the clock on the stove) 🙂
Chad Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 11:54 am
Great read! My favorite is, by far, the windows/family guy joke! Seth probably didn’t negotiate it, but MS HAD to know what they were getting into! It’s so choice!
M Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:32 pm
Wow, this is a seriously good piece of literature. It really goes to show that even though the big corporations hide behind their fancy logos, catchy phrases, and expensive ad campaigns all designed to create a perception of wisdom and innovation, behind the scenes they struggle to understand consumers and where technology is taking us.

‘Wired’ only wishes it were savvy enough to write something this good, but it’s not. This article has severely affected my productivity for the day. Good thing I’m paid by the hour….
HamNCheese Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:35 pm
> On September 14th, Microsoft releases Windows Millennium Edition (aka Windows Me).

IN THE YEAR 2000…
cshapiro Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 2:13 pm
Gametap.com launches with great fanfare in October 2005.
After burning through perhaps as much as $60 * 10^6 in development and promotion costs, Time Warner (TBS)’s gametap.com is sold to a French video gaming company for $6 * 10^6 in Sep 2008. After the sale, subscribers using Apple computers find that they can no longer use the service. Gamers everywhere yawn.
John Doe Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:10 pm
And hot from the press, Verizon’s latest dick move to shove Microsoft’s Bing into their BlackBerry users’ faces: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/19/verizon_snuffs_google_for_bing/
Peter da Silva Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:21 pm
The y2k problem was a snoozer because a LOT of geeks worked a LOT of hours in 1998 and 1999 to fix the problem before it happened. I was in a y2k war room and when midnight passed our first customer without the lights going out in Canberra (our product was controlling the Snowy Mountains Project electrical grid) we all cheered.

Outside the y2k war rooms of thousands of companies whose software was supporting the world’s industrial base, nobody heard that cheer, but we damn well won that war before the first (potential) shot was fired.
Harry McCracken Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:25 pm
I agree that Y2K was a snoozer not because there wasn’t a problem, but because we (and by we, I mean the geeks charged with solving things) fixed it in time. The item’s not on the list because people worried, it’s there because of the people who were positive that apocalypse was imminent…

–Harry
Arby Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 8:33 pm
I dont get the people arguing that there’s no year zero. Yes there is. When you’re born, you’re not instantly 1! You start from nothing and count up to 1 year completed, and so forth. 10 marks a 10 years completed. Make sense?
Sean Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:11 pm
Come on Harry, now you’re just trying to save face.

“When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don’t know what the heck they’re talking about.”
(2nd sentence in this article)

..”people who were positive that apocalypse was imminent” has nothing to do with what you’ve written here. This was an embarrassing attempt to undermine “experts” using your lack of knowledge about the events surrounding the Y2K bug and its repair.

Shenanigans!
Nameless Wonder Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:17 pm
Guys and gals, about the Y2K issue: Harry is NOT saying that is was not much of a problem to fix, he’s talking about predictions of “widespread starvation, utility failures, medical emergencies, and financial catastroph”, which obviously did not happen.

Because the problem was addressed, indeed.

Personally, I remember being a bit frustrated by the irrational talk of various kinds of mayhem and things that might happen, invariably by people that had no meaningful understanding of the inner workings of computer systems, which includes pretty much all “normal” non-IT folk. I mean no offense, this is just how it is (most of the Hollywood movies and TV shows that have anything to do with computers are certainly not helping here). I think this category also includes some newscasters, journalists and editors and such, hence the news predictions of disaster…

The professionals in the meantime did what needed to be done – mission accomplished, job well done. In Harry’s words “the world has addressed the Y2K problem remarkably well”. So consider yourselves acknowledged. 🙂
Henry Wood Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 10:45 am
Great Blog. Keep up the great work.
IT Professional Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 11:00 am
“When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don’t know what the heck they’re talking about.”

I worked for a major airline, and we spent two years running up to 2000 checking every single system we owned for Y2K compliance. Where they had been provided by third parties, if they were unable to certify that their system was Y2K compliant, we looked for a replacement system, or planned for workaround processes that could be put in place

We found and fixed date-related bugs in flight booking, passenger tracking, baggage handling, ground operations, crew rostering, maintenance scheduling, procurement and warehouse systems.

We set up an operations room that ramped up as the end of 1999 approached, until it had 24-hour coverage by the end of the year. Every team had staff on call over the change-over.

It was this level of effort and attention to detail by IT professionals in every industry that allowed us to manage the effect of many years of non-Y2K compliant code. Your comments show you have no understanding of the work done by real IT professionals.
Harry McCracken Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 11:30 am
Sorry, IT Professional, but I understand the problem and am well aware of all the work that went into fixing Y2K.

That’s why I said that it turned out the world’s response turned out to be good (not that there was nothing worth worrying about).

That’s why I said that the problems turned out to be largely minor when January 1st came around (not that there weren’t serious issues beforehand).

You seem to be upset about an item I didn’t write, in which I maintain that the Y2K bug didn’t need to be fixed. Or that those responsible for for fixing it did a crummy job. Or something.

Once again, my point was this: A lot of “experts” got attention and money by confidently predicting epic disaster starting on January 1st, 2000. Their predictions were lame–because you and your colleagues and everyone else responsible for solving things had the issue in hand. Is it just possible that my item is a compliment to the people who addressed Y2K rather than an insult?

–Harry
Francesco Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 1:00 pm
>> Is it just possible that my item is a compliment to the people who addressed Y2K rather than an insult?

Mmmm… No. Really not.

I mean, the “predictions were lame” because “someone confidently predicting epic disaster” convinced all the others to fix it. The disater was avoided not only by the techical guys that fixed it, but also by the panicking non technicals that scared everyone until eventually all got tested hundred times.
Duggeek Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 1:19 pm
So… to round it up to 90, we just need to add:

1. Xbox 360 “Red Ring of Death” affects around 40% of the devices sold.
(Really… what’s NOT lame about that!?)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xbox_360_technical_problems

2. Microsoft wildly inflates Vista sales figures in an attempt to save face.
(Post-rationalization meets impatience meets out-and-out lies)
http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/vista/stacking_vista_licenses_too_high.html

3. Dell laptops begin to ignite, explode because of shoddy batteries.
(Dude, get down! You got a Dell!)
http://explodinglaptop.com/
…that’s right, someone made a dedicated site for this phenomenon. That alone should be reason to include it on this almighty list.

Switching gears to address the list as-is:

Oh the blessed fail that is #17 (Microsoft “companions”) to properly portray it, you should have a separate listing for each Microsoft product that used these unholy creations. (XP, Office, DevStudio, even Server)

So you have #36, but it’s about Google and not Video Professor? I agree that the Web Accelerator deserves a spot, but Video Professor does too! How about the class-action suit about deceptive sales practices, particularly in the “virtual currency” offers within certain Facebook apps?
Here’s the scoop…
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/video-professor-washington-post-scamville/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29

What’s not mentioned in #67 (Windows Mojave) is what makes that such a lame effort on the part of Microsoft. Of course people are impressed by watching a demonstration! Of course people are going to go “ooh” and “aah” for the shiny new Aero interface! What they don’t show are how these people are regularly disappointed about UAC confusion, buggy device support and more-than-typical crashes during regular use. All that the “Mojave experiment” could prove was that Microsoft is fully capable of polishing the fail-turd to a spectacular shine.

I like that #87 (Misfit Toys commercial) mentions the failure of AT&T to act upon a competitor’s advertising. Verizon issued a brilliant ad-campaign with “the map”. If you want to add more on this, just keep counting the number of “backlash” AT&T commercials featuring a past-prime Luke Wilson touting- well… nothing. Analyze the claims from the Luke Wilson commercials and you’ll get nothing more than the sales propaganda AT&T has been spouting all along. (I don’t care how fast their 3G is; but does it work where I’m standing right now?) Moreover, none of the ads refute Verizon’s claims in the slightest; they’re all smoke-and-mirrors hogwash.

Still, it’s a great list. Well done. I’d nearly forgotten about some of those—like the Foleo—and like many, just kept rolling forward with “what works.”
Randall Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 3:54 pm
RE Webvan; AmazonFresh is running strong here in Seattle and it’s a fantastic service! I just had some Christmas presents and groceries delivered last night.

Also the HP/iPod hybrid was back when Apple was only making Mac versions of the iPod. That was their first attempt at a PC version of the iPod. I guess they assumed that some PC users wouldn’t realize that they could use an Apple product with their PC.
Paul Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 5:38 pm
What about Steve, the Dell Dude, hawking Dell PC’s with the line, ‘Dude, you’re getting a Dell!’. It worked at first, lifting Dell to #1. Then disaster struck, poor customer service, class-action lawsuits for ‘bait-and-switch’ tactics, and finally, exploding laptops. Dell dropped to #3, easily the biggest technology flame-out of the decade. To top it all off, Steve was charged in NY with possession, never appearing in a Dell ad again.
Paul Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 5:45 pm
What about Steve, the Dell Dude? He hawked Dell PC’s with the line, ‘Dude, you’re getting a Dell!’ It helped raise Dell to #1. Then, disaster struck, with customer service complaints, class action lawsuits for ‘bait-and-switch’ sales tactics, and exploding laptops. Dell dropped to #3 — easily the biggest technology flame-out of the decade! To top it off, Steve was more of a Dude than we knew, arrested in NY for possession, never to do another Dell ad again.
steve Says:
December 24th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
Zot is an idiot
John Smith Says:
December 25th, 2009 at 7:42 am
Missed Snow Leopard letting guest accounts delete everything on the hard drive.
Oh wait. It is Apple so that is not a bug it is part of “The world’s most advanced OS” which has just been certified as UNIX.
Karey Says:
December 25th, 2009 at 10:43 am
No Windows 7 house party ads?
Backlight Says:
December 26th, 2009 at 6:03 am
The company I used to work for bought a pallet jack from Circuit City; it was the most high-tech purchase that company ever made.And I remember being very confused when I bought the Apple iPod by HP. And if I remember right, there was HP branding all over iTunes, before Apple built their PC version.
Bill Says:
December 26th, 2009 at 11:55 pm
E-Machine … That is all .
mdr410 Says:
December 27th, 2009 at 2:31 pm
awesome! thanks for putting this together!
Y2K was real Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 5:43 am
Y2K remediation efforts in the years leading up to the year 2000 are the reason why widespread Y2K-related problems were avoided.

Companies that did not do Y2K remediation were impacted by the problem, and their Y2K problems became the problems of their business partners. For example, a PTT in the Pacific Basin that our company and scores of other international IXCs had reverse charge billing arrangements with did not make its systems Y2K-compliant by 1/1/2000. When it produced its January bills, it discovered they were screwed up specifically as a consequence of its systems’ non-Y2K compliance. Furthermore, the PTT was unable to provide correct reverse charge billing data to our company and to other international carriers for the same reason. Typically we billed approximately 4,000 collect calls a month that originated from that PTT’s customers. Worldwide, there were tens of thousands of international collect and calling card calls originating from this PTT — all unbillable owing to its screwed up CDRs and billing records. It wasn’t until August 2000 that the PTT fixed its systems and was able to bill customers again and provide international carriers with correct reverse charge billing data.
chunky Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 8:31 pm
How ’bout the blue screen of death that was projected onto the ceiling of the Chinese Olympic stadium?
Bill Walsh Says:
December 29th, 2009 at 8:26 am
The TRS-80 wasn’t a Commodore. It was from Tandy/Radio Shack. You’re thinking of the VIC-20.
Anthony Nonymous Says:
December 29th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
THE number ONE Lame Moment in Tech, with the greatest consequences, was the hacking of voting machines, resulting in the thefts of the 2000 US Presidential Election (particularly in Florida), and again in 2004 (particularly in Ohio)
Ray Says:
December 30th, 2009 at 12:01 am
Yeah…the Y2K bug…funny how its so much like what the man made global warming issue is today. Soon the truth will be realized that is it a big hoax.
Max Says:
December 30th, 2009 at 10:46 am
Here are 2 dumb tech moments by #1 and #2 Democrats:

1. Gordon Brown presents Obama a pen holder carved from the timbers of HMS Gannett, a sister ship of HMS Resolute; the commissioning certificate of HMS Resolute; and a seven-volume biography of Winston Churchill. In return, the Prime minister gets 25 DVDS, which don’t work in Britain.

2. Joe Biden forgets the “website number” for the White House internet site designed to show how TARP money is being spent.
simpletechguru Says:
December 30th, 2009 at 12:43 pm
Wow! This must have taken forever to write! Great list and lots of fun. Hindsight IS 20-20…but let us look at our history lest we repeat it again and again and again.

Thanks!
Phil Ant Says:
December 31st, 2009 at 12:59 am
@Anthony Nonymous:

Tell me, how do you hack MANUAL voting machines? Y’know, those that were used in FL in the ’00 election? The ones where you make a selection beforehand then PULL A FREAKIN’ LEVER?
Reduziert Says:
February 10th, 2010 at 1:18 am
The “Monkey Boy” video is always awesome, no matter how often you watch it 🙂
Moran Says:
April 20th, 2010 at 7:43 am
Nice Post, I would like to add one more dumbest thing OR you can say its the champion of the Dumbest thing contest.. The ugly red ring of death.. Last month I came across this problem with my xbox 360 and its the nightmare for me. Though I had repaired my xbox red ring of death problem by following guide but its not the permanent solution.

Do you guys have any permanent solution for this deadly red ring of death?
PC Boxen Says:
August 3rd, 2010 at 12:58 am
i laughed hard 😀 amazing moments
Best wallpapers Says:
October 10th, 2010 at 12:03 am
This is very intresting, You are a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post.
Nadine Says:
October 28th, 2010 at 4:41 pm
[…]this dumb decade […]
James Billig Says:
November 18th, 2010 at 7:00 am
For me Windows ME really was an all time low, completely useless piece of code and software.
dreambox dm600 pvr Says:
December 7th, 2010 at 12:03 am
The company I used to work for bought a pallet jack from Circuit City; it was the most high-tech purchase that company ever made.

And I remember being very confused when I bought the Apple iPod by HP. And if I remember right, there was HP branding all over iTunes, before Apple built their PC version.
aircraft parts Says:
December 20th, 2010 at 12:10 am
I have you bookmarked your web site to check out the brand new stuff you post.Should you're keen on having a visitor weblog poster please reply and let me know. I will give you unique content in your website, thanks.
xboxringofdeathfix Says:
January 25th, 2011 at 11:12 pm
What is SJW saying i wonder?
Existenzgründung Says:
March 5th, 2011 at 10:05 am
I still like Balmer going crazy. One of the best videos 😉
Jamaica Airport Says:
May 8th, 2011 at 3:38 am
As I web site possessor I believe the content material here is rattling wonderful , appreciate it for your efforts. You should keep it up forever! Good Luck.
watch wwe Says:
May 8th, 2011 at 3:39 am
Great ¡V I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all the tabs as well as related information ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, web site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Nice task..
road rash iso Says:
May 8th, 2011 at 3:40 am
Valuable information. Fortunate me I found your website accidentally, and I am shocked why this accident didn't happened earlier! I bookmarked it.
Jalisa Zakar Says:
June 30th, 2011 at 11:40 am
Hey I am so excited I found your website https://www.technologizer.com/2009/12/20/dumb-moments, I really found you by mistake, while I was searching on Askjeeve for something else, Regardless I am here now and would just like to say thank you for a marvelous post and an all round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read it all at the moment but I have saved it and also added in your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read a great deal more, Please do keep up the superb job.

10 random things to learn on December 22nd | Nilesh Babu Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:02 am
[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 If ever a decade began dumb, it was this one.* When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don’t know what the heck they’re talking about. […]
The 87 Lamest Moments In Tech, 2000-2009 | JetLib News Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:53 am
[…] writes “The last ten years have been an amazing era for tech — and full of amazingly dumb moments. I rounded up scads of them. I suspect you’ll be able to figure out which company is most […]
This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 « andinspired Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 4:30 am
[…] Technology Leave a Comment Tags: collection, dumb, google, microsoft, tech, windows Nice collection of dumb moments in tech over the last 10 […]
أغبى 87 تعليق على التكنولوجيا من 2000 حتى 2009 | Technology & Science Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 5:23 am
[…] أغبى 87 تعليق على التكنولوجيا من 2000 حتى 2009 […]
This Decade’s dumbest tech moments « Currently Nameless Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:38 am
[…] You can find the article here: https://www.technologizer.com/2009/12/20/dumb-moments/ […]
The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 @ AskWoody.com Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 7:43 am
[…] McCracken (who knows more than a bit about lame – hi, Harry!) has a funtastic list in Technologizer going through the 87 lamest moments from January 1, 2000 to […]
The Decade`s 87 Lamest Moments in Tech | Utter Oddness | Surge Bucket Media Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 9:16 am
[…] Link: Read more […]
Windows ME? On the list. | MANGOAT DOT NET Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 10:36 am
[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 | Technologizer. This entry was written by Mangoat, posted on December 22, 2009 at 8:48 am, and filed under HELP COMPUTER, Space and Tech. « Dressed up as a superhero as a kid? This is the blog for you. Who saw this coming? » […]
This dumb decade | Big Lazy SysAdmin Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 1:44 pm
[…] Slashdot, cele mai stupide 87 de momente din industria IT petrecute între anii […]
Funny as hell « Student Life and Relationships Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 3:51 pm
[…] This Dumb Decade: 87 Dumbest Moments in Tech, 2000 – 2009 […]
Top Posts — WordPress.com Says:
December 22nd, 2009 at 4:14 pm
[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 If ever a decade began dumb, it was this one.* When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug […] […]
FOI Topics and Links of the Week :: The Future of the Internet — And How to Stop It Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 7:34 am
[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009. Not so much the future of the internet, but the recent past. Many of the recent lame moments have been covered in this blog (Danger Sidekick phones lose users’ data for weeks; Apple rejects Google Voice; Amazon removes 1984 from the Kindle). The old stuff is fun. I didn’t know that Facebook donated $9.5 million to a privacy-education foundation after the Beacon fiasco. […]
Los peores 87 momentos tecnológicos de la década [ENG] Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 11:13 am
[…] Los peores 87 momentos tecnológicos de la década [ENG] technologizer.com/2009/12/20/dumb-moments por SantiH hace pocos segundos […]
aktuelle Netznachrichten 2009-12-23 : VitoNet Says:
December 23rd, 2009 at 1:49 pm
[…] Die dümmsten IT-Tech-Momente des Jahrzehnts (bei technologizer) […]
Apple, Pong, Irrtümer, 2009 und mehr > News, Tipps > 2009, Apple, Ballmer, Irrtümer, Pong Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 8:12 am
[…] Tech Irrtümer und Peinlichkeiten Auf technologizer.com gibt es eine Liste von 87 Dingen, die im Technologie-Bereich von 2000 bis 2009 schief gegangen sind […]
The Shoddy Aughties: Best of the Decade's Worst Lists » The ENGINE Blog » ENGINE Industries, Atlanta Web Design Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
[…] 87 Lamest Moments by Technologizer […]
Links 12/29/2009 Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 11:30 pm
[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 | Technologizer […]
Les tops de l’année 2009. | Alban Badger Says:
December 29th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
[…] pessimistes, Technologizer revient sur 87 évènements qui font de cette décénie la plus bête (Dumb Decade)… L’occasion de voir les différents errements des grandes compagnies, comme Apple et […]
You Like Lists, Do You? Here Are Fifty of ‘em | Technologizer Says:
December 31st, 2009 at 11:23 am
[…] The decade's 87 lamest moments […]
Podcast Ep 119 – Last Show of the Decade! - Geekazine 2010 Says:
January 2nd, 2010 at 5:31 pm
[…] went the last 10 years and where Geekazine is going for the next 10. The One Thing Apple Did Wrong 87 Dumb Moments Ubuntu Looks like Windows […]
10 Dumb Technologies You Don't Want In 2010 | New Technology and Cool Gadgets Says:
January 2nd, 2010 at 9:51 pm
[…] count on one (actually two) hand. If you can’t get enough of dummies, I suggest you hop over here for a recap of goofy technologies in the past decade. December 25th, 2009 in Technology | tags: […]
Links for December 16th through January 4th – eclecticism Says:
January 4th, 2010 at 10:02 am
[…] This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009: "If ever a decade began dumb, it was this one. When clocks struck midnight on January 1st and the dreaded Y2K bug turned out to be nothing but a mild irritant, it proved once again that the experts often don't know what the heck they're talking about." […]
This Dumb Decade: The 87 Lamest Moments in Tech, 2000-2009 | Videos,News,Softwares,TV Shows and much more Says:
March 20th, 2010 at 7:51 am
[…] https://www.technologizer.com/2009/12/20/dumb-moments/ […]
This Dumb Year: The 57 Lamest Tech Moments of 2010 Says:
December 21st, 2010 at 1:33 am
[…] the industry’s lame moments are…well, lame, they can also be important. Last year, I summed up a decade’s worth of tech screw-ups and came up with 87 examples. This time around, I’m covering only a single year–but I […]
This Dumb Year: The 57 Lamest Tech Moments of 2010 | Hot Electronics Trends Says:
December 23rd, 2010 at 7:26 am
[…] that while the industry’s lame moments are…well, lame, they can also be important. Last year, I summed up a decade’s worth of tech screw-ups and came up with 87 examples. This time around, I’m covering only a single year–but I found 57 […]
Bad Tech « Ed Parnell's Cunning Plan Says:
December 25th, 2010 at 11:21 pm
[…] that while the industry’s lame moments are…well, lame, they can also be important. Last year, I summed up a decade’s worth of tech screw-ups and came up with 87 examples. This time around, I’m covering only a single year–but I found 57 […]
Averting Disaster | Quiet Babylon Says:
March 18th, 2011 at 8:23 pm
[…] at the end of the decade, the Y2K story has been reduced to the status of overblown hoax. Which raises the question: How would […]

The Weird History of Windows
Laptopia: Twenty-One Totally Bizarre Laptops
Fifteen Classic Game Console Design Mistakes
The Thirteen Greatest Error Messages of All Time
When the Muppets Worked for IBM
Tech Products That Were Brilliant. And Doomed
The Legend of the Legend of Zelda
15 Breakthrough Products That Went Absolutely Nowhere
The 25 Most Notable Quotes in Tech History
How 1940s Whiskey Ads Predicted the Future
The Great Operating System Games
The Weird Secret Origin of Tech's Favorite Insult

Technologizer by Harry McCracken