Google Chrome Turns One: A Few Questions and Answers

By  |  Wednesday, September 2, 2009 at 2:47 am

Chrome BirthdayOne year ago today, Google released Chrome, a day after the news–at once startling and inevitable-feeling–leaked that it had decided to get into the browser business. (Lest we forget, Chrome remains the only major software product ever to be announced via comic book.)

Back on September 1st, 2008, I hadn’t yet had the opportunity to try Chrome and knew very little about it, but was so excited about the news that I cranked out a post called Ten Questions About Google Chrome. A year later, it’s easier to answer most of them. Shall we? (I skipped recapping question #3, which involved me wondering whether Google had given Mozilla a heads-up it was working on a browser.)

1. Will Google stop promoting Firefox? It’s been known to use the Google homepage to tell IE users they should be running Firefox, and it distributes a version of Firefox with the Google Toolbar built in. You gotta think that it’ll redeploy some or all of its Firefox-boosting energies to drumming up interest in Chrome.

One year later: Yeah, it stopped promoting Firefox. The companies still have a mutually beneficial relationship, since Google remains Firefox’s default search engine, and revenues from the ads displayed with search results helps fund Firefox development. And you can still get Firefox–optionally–as part of Google Pack. But Chrome is now Pack’s default browser, and there’s no question which product Google is rooting for in Browser War 2.0. (Hint: It’s the one with “Google” in its name.)

2. Will Mozilla decide Google is an enemy, not a friend? Probably not–as Kara [Swisher] notes, the companies recently extended the relationship that puts Google into Firefox as its default search engine until 2011. That deal makes Mozilla millions of dollars a year, which is presumably enough to make Google at worst a frenemy of Mozilla. It’s hard–although not impossible–to imagine Mozilla being so ticked off by Google launching a browser that it takes its search business to someone else, such as Yahoo.

One year later: Google ads remain Mozilla’s principal source of revenue. And even if Firefox’s creator is uneasy about that–and I don’t know whether it is–I kinda doubt that it’s going to take its business to Binghoo.

4. Just how hard will Google push Chrome on the Google homepage? Like no other company on earth, Google has an opportunity to get hundreds of millions of people using its browser in a relatively short amount of time. You gotta think that it’ll use the Google homepage to drum up interest. But will it check to see if you’re using IE, Firefox, or another browser and attempt to convince you to switch?

One year later: Google sometimes promotes Chrome on its home page when you view it in other browsers, although not continuously–or at least it isn’t doing so for me right now. Its ad for Chrome within Gmail strikes me as a tad pushy (it sticks an exclamation point–a rarity in Googleland–onto the end of its urgent-looking notification that Google Runs Faster in Chrome!) It’s also advertised its browser on YouTube and Facebook and even the boob tube. But I still have the feeling we haven’t seen what would happen if the company really decided to bang the Chrome drum.

5. Will Google try to convert Google Toolbar users into Chrome users? Toolbar is presumably Google’s most widely-used piece of software at the moment, and it seems inevitable that Google will want to let users know about Chrome. But will it, say, try to bundle Chrome into the Toolbar download from now on? Apple discovered that bundling is dangerous when it caught flack for distributing Safari for Windows via the iTunes updater.

One year later: As far as I know, Google hasn’t tried particularly hard to turn all those millions of Toolbar users into Chrome users, and the company seems to be a good scout when it comes to avoiding slipping downloads onto your system that you didn’t specifically request. But enough Toolbar fans have tried Chrome that this brief post I wrote a year ago today on the lack of a Google Toolbar for Chrome is one of the most-read Technologizer items to date.

6. How deeply will Chrome be integrated with other Google projects? It’ll include Gears. Will it tie into Google Maps and Google Print and Google Desktop and the 18,432,922 other Google projects in ways that a non-Google browser wouldn’t?

One year later: Every once in awhile, I ask members of the Chrome team if they plan to meld their browser with Google services. They either don’t quite understand what I’m getting at, or want to tapdance around the issue–maybe because of the potential of criticism for Microsoftian conflicts of interest. I know of no real integration of Chrome with Google services, and the only place I’ve seen the company suggest that Google services are best used in a Google browser is in that Gmail notification.

7. Or to put that last question another way, will Google services work better in Chrome than other browsers? A conspiracy theorist could easily come up with scenarios in which Google starts to tie together its offerings in ways that resemble the tactics that Microsoft used in the 1990s to drive IE adoption and discourage use of Netscape. Google is too smart and too well intentioned to go down that route in the same way, I’m sure. But even a company with good intentions might do things that reasonable people (or even the courts think are anti-competitive.

One year later: Again, Google does tell Gmail users that the service runs faster in Chrome. But I think the message there is not “We conspired to make our e-mail work best in our browser” so much as “Chrome runs rich AJAX services great, and Gmail is a rich AJAX service.”

8. Just how popular could Chrome get? Can it get to ten percent marketshare? Twenty? Forty? Ninety? Firefox has shown that it’s possible for a good new browser to gain plenty of traction, and Chrome will have advantages that even Firefox doesn’t have in terms of distribution.

and

9. Who will it steal users from? Kara says that Chrome is at least a part response to Google concerns that IE 8 may be bad for Google’s search-and-advertising business. So the company would presumably be pleased if IE users jump ship for Chrome. But if you can divide the world into folks who will switch to a better browser and those who won’t, a high percentage of the former group has likely already moved to Firefox. You can imagine a scenario in which the arrival of Chrome results in Firefox’s marketshare gains stalling. Or even in Firefox use eroding.

One year later: Chrome is getting more popular–but not at a particularly spectacular clip. New research says that Firefox has 23.3 percent market share (and growing) and Chrome has eked out 2.9 percent so far. And here’s a chart of how the two browsers compare in usage over at PCWorld.com–it shows Chrome growing slowly but steadily, and Firefox bumping around a bit but seemingly not losing users to Chrome in any consistent fashion:

Chrome vs. Firefox

10. Will Chrome stay on the desktop? Google sees its future as being highly mobile, as witness its work on Android and all the work it’s put into making services like Gmail and Google Maps work well on iPhone, Windows Mobile, BlackBerry, and other mobile platforms. Will we see Chrome on phones?

One year later: Even Android’s browser isn’t called Chrome. Google did indeed decide to take Chrome new places, but it was in operating system form rather than onto new platforms as a browser.

So there you go. Let’s end this with a few more questions 365 days later, and very brief answers…

Is it still hard to tell just how serious Google is about Chrome? Yes.

Is it a good sign that Google has released three major versions in the browser’s first year? Probably.

Do you worry that the existence of Chrome OS means that Chrome-the-browser is no longer an exciting shiny thing that Google will lavish attention on? I do.

Is it frustrating that it’s a year later and Chrome still isn’t finished for Macs? Definitely.

Do you harbor a secret fantasy that Google’s big Chrome birthday celebration today will include the release of Chrome for OS X? How’d you guess?

Do you use Chrome? Yes, much of the time when I’m using a Windows PC.

Is the world a better place because Google got into the browser business? I think so, yes.

Has the world changed because Google got into the browser business? Not much. At least not yet. Less than I might have guessed, anyhow.

If you’ve got any other questions, answers, or reflections on Chrome as it turns one, I’d love to hear them…

 
25 Comments


Read more: , ,

18 Comments For This Post

  1. Oliver Says:

    I like chrome. It doesnt have enough features to overtake firefox for me, but its definently getting there. Its speed is a huge advantage, but it just needs more features to overtake firefox’s addons

  2. Disputatore Says:

    @Oliver: But can you guess what will happen to Chrome’s speed if they add more features? :-)

  3. Carlos Cardona Says:

    Good article. You said “Do you worry that the existence of Chrome OS means that Chrome-the-browser is no longer an exciting shiny thing that Google will lavish attention on? I do”. I disagree. It is clear that chrome (the browser) will be google’s choice to ship with the up-coming chrome (OS). In fact it looks like the browser WILL BE the OS. That leads me to believe that Google thinks chrome (the browser) is the shiniest thing going. Chrome (the browser) and Chrome (OS) will be one and the same. Time will see who is right.
    Thanks for the good article.

  4. Hugh Isaacs II Says:

    @Disputatore: They speed up Chrome regardless, I use the developer version which updates weekly and even with Bookmark Syncing, Extensions, Userscripts, etc… it hasn’t slowed down for me.

    Though I won’t lie, memory use did increase greatly when I used all of these features (but I think that was partially because I was on Windows 7 with a MacBook Pro, two things that don’t work together well).

  5. TonyZ Says:

    I like chrome, but I’m sticking with Firefox for now. I like that eventually it will remember my bookmarks and history and It will sync it with my Android device (when they make a mobile version of Chrome).

  6. Matt Lavallee Says:

    “I know of no real integration of Chrome with Google services”

    I think the Gears tie-in is not as subtle as stated; Gears provides a desktop environment (complete with Offline mode) to web applications, in which Google clearly has strategic interest.

    It would not take a Machiavellian scheme to:
    1. Release Gears to add custom functionality to all browsers. Check.
    2. Release apps that leverage Gears to deliver full experience. Check.
    3. Release browser with Gears as an integrated component. Check.
    4. Start making money from integrated apps. Check.
    5. Release “cloud desktop” based on Chrome/Gears. Pending.
    5. Stop updating Gears on other platforms. Pending.

    That would put Chrome in a fairly enviable position in the long run.

  7. scribblin Says:

    Recently I spent 10 days trying out IE8, Opera, Chrome, Safari, Firefox, and Flock. On an MSI notebook with 2g of RAM and an Intel Atom processor, Opera was the fastest and Firefox the slowest. Chrome was 2nd fastest.

    I like Chrome okay, but Opera has better features and is more fun to use. Unfortunately, both Opera and Chrome totally bogged when I opened 10 tabs (six of them were social networking sites) and made them all do things. Firefox, Flock and Safari soldiered right on.

    Flock is Firefox on steroids — good ones, too. It aggregates social networking sites, integrates Facebook chat and notices into the browser, has a rockin’ media bar, etc., etc. It’s really tomorrow’s browser today, if you’re into social networking (like most of the world).

    Chrome is just okay. But today, it’s not good enough to just be okay. I’d like to see Chrome and Seesmic (or something like that) merge. A browser that can double as a solid cross-posting machine between social networking sites (Flock can do a bit of this, but it needs improvement) would be the bomb.

  8. Irha Says:

    Regarding bugs, they mention how many are fixed, but they don’t mention how many are closed as “won’t fix”. There are some important bugs that they rejected. E.g., see the below and see how even months after closing, users advocate its importance, and nobody from development cares to reopen:

    http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1820

  9. wave Says:

    happy birthday chrome!

  10. Brian Says:

    This is a really nice perspective of the history of Google Chrome. I have been using Google Chrome since it was in it’s first beta phase, and have loved it since then. In fact, on April 1, 2009, I fell for their Google Chrome 3D joke. I enjoy using the browser, but this article makes you realize how close Google and the Mozilla Organization are.

  11. John Says:

    I’ve been using the Google Chrome Mac preview for a couple of months now and I have to say I like it: so much so that I’ve switched from Safari (which went downhill from v4 IMHO). Google are pushing out updates almost every week and I’d say it’s getting close to release quality now.

  12. F. Andy Seidl Says:

    A year ago I thought that Chrome was disruptive technology hiding in plain site. Now, a year later, I still think that’s true. I just blogged about that yesterday:

    Google Chrome: Disruptive Technology Beginning to Sparkle
    All of Sony’s (SNE) Vaio PCs in the U.S will use Google’s (GOOG) Chrome as their default Web browser.
    http://faseidl.com/public/item/238851

  13. robinmaster698 Says:

    I dont know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.Premium Web Directory

  14. robinmaster698 Says:

    The course lasts a year and successful completion entitles you to take the usual nursing qualifications.Business Directory

  15. robinmaster698 Says:

    At the age 21, this screen veteran of only a few years is already an articulate professional savvy about both the business and art of her chosen profession.Business Directory

  16. jackson Says:

    Though I won't lie, memory use did increase greatly when I used all of these features (but I think that was partially because I was on Windows 7 with a MacBook Pro, two things that don't work together well).
    descargar juegos

  17. robinmaster698 Says:

    Variable Price allows customers to specify their own price for a product instead of using a fixed price. This makes it a useful module for donation sites! Online Bookmarking

  18. jimCalilo Says:

    Google is already way to powerful even if Mozilla decided to make them, their anyway they would fall. With the most recent changes to Google I believe there may be a backlash in the near future as I feel they are becoming way to greedy. red deer photographer services

7 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Live-Point Official Blog » Blog Archive » Google Chrome Turns One: A Few Questions and Answers | Technologizer Says:

    [...] Here is the original post: Google Chrome Turns One: A Few Questions and Answers | Technologizer [...]

  2. Happy Birthday Chrome — 7.23% of Our Readers Use You Says:

    [...] of our page views in the last six months were in the Chrome browser. According to The Technologizer, Chrome only holds 2.9% of the overall browser market, so our audience appreciates the simple speediness of Chrome more than your average web user. As a [...]

  3. Harry McCracken on the One-Year Anniversary of Chrome « Says:

    [...] Original source : http://technologizer.com/2009/09/02/google-chrome-… [...]

  4. mysocialbrain: 03-09-2009 : protagonist Says:

    [...] chrome one year old birthday candle? [...]

  5. Google Chrome, One Year Later | Everything's Social Says:

    [...] Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments   [...]

  6. “Google Blog: What is a web browser?” — A campaign, of course « Irrational Ideas Says:

    [...] Today’s Google Blog entry, Jason Toff posted a well crafted 1min video intro to web browsers. It’s been over a year since the initial release of Chrome, so what’s the messaging these days? Did you catch the pitch to the layman web browser user? [...]

  7. What is This “Browser” of Which You Speak? | Technologizer Says:

    [...] site is, of course a thinly-veiled promotional vehicle for Google Chrome. Although it’s an extremely soft sell–and since there’s no shipping version of [...]

Comment on This Story