Maybe Apple TV Should Be a TV

By  |  Wednesday, July 22, 2009 at 4:07 pm

Apple TVAlas, poor Apple TV. Its manufacturer likes to treat nearly everything it makes as both a technological breakthrough and sales blockbuster, but when it discusses Apple TV at all, it usually dismisses it as a “hobby.” As New TeeVee’s Chris Albrecht points out, the little white set-top box got nary a mention during Apple’s financial conference call yesterday.

Apple TV is actually pretty good–I own one and use it with a TV that has no other means of receiving programming–but it’s a nice product in a category that may never change the world in the way that the Mac, iPod, and iPhone have. There just seem to be a limited number of folks out there who want Internet-based entertainment in the living room enough to go through the cost and hassle of installing a box. Apple TV competitors Vudu and Roku–both of which I also like–face the same issue, but as the products of much smaller companies, they presumably can be counted as successes even if sales never explode. Apple, on the other hand, is used to selling its gadgets by the tens of millions.

When you come down to it, though, Apple TV isn’t about being a box: It’s about giving you access to tons of content on your TV. The box itself is an encumbrance, especially if your entertainment center is already as crammed with stuff as mine is. Wouldn’t Apple TV be cooler if it went boxless–by being built into new TVs?

This isn’t a new idea–in fact, it’s one of those persistent Apple rumors that hasn’t come true to date, but might someday. In its usual form, it involves Apple getting into the HDTV biz itself. I’d like to see that happen, but I can think of more reasons why Apple might not want to make TVs than ones why it would. TVs are a commodity; TVs come in too many sizes; TVs wouldn’t give Apple true control over the user experience. (There’s no way the company could completely disintermediate the cable company or mask all of its bad interface decisions.)

But even if Apple doesn’t want to make TVs, it could integrate Apple TV into TVs–by offering the platform as a feature which TV companies can integrate into their sets, in a fashion similar to Yahoo’s cool Internet TV platform. You gotta think that TV manufacturers would jump at the chance to sell an iTunes-ready TV. And when I buy a new HDTV, built-in access to the music and movies I’ve already bought from Apple would be a meaningful selling point.

TV makers might not want to build a hard drive into their sets to accommodate Apple TV, but that’s okay–another unfulfilled Apple rumor involves something called iTunes Replay, which would store your entertainment on a distant server and stream it to your devices on demand. Such as…your TV!

Yes, I know that Apple has a lousy track record when it comes to putting its technology into other companies’ products. (Exhibit A: the Motorola iTunes phone.) But it surely wants to establish an outpost in our living rooms, in a way that goes beyond being a mere hobby. I’m willing to be surprised–and knowing Apple, I probably have this all wrong–but the moment, I can’t think of a more logical way for it to do that than to build the iTunes experience right into our TVs.


Read more: , ,

5 Comments For This Post

  1. John Baxter Says:

    Do I want to buy a box that contains two devices that wear out at different rates? Where do I get it serviced?

    At the very least, the hard drive–if there is one–has to be user-replaceable. Maybe an SSD when the price makes sense?

  2. Simon Says:

    It’s not integrated TVs that Apple TV needs- it’s Hulu built in. Dyou think Hollywood really wants to go there though?

  3. ediedi Says:

    I thought about getting an aTV for streaming content from my computer to my TV. I ended up getting an xbox which is great for that – plays avi, mp4, and has a DVD drive.. In addition, xbox Movie rentals work, while the iTunes video and music are not available where i live (Romania). By the way, it also plays games…

  4. dt Says:

    strangely, I’ve never used an apple tv. but we have roku attached to one tv (actually a projector) plus a laptop, and we have an xbox attached to a flat panel tv plus a windows desktop. yes we are geeks, but it wasn’t particularly challenging. our biggest problem is when we forget we can watch something on netflix or hulu for ‘free’ and end up downloading it from amazon video for $4.

    so do I need apple tv inside my tv? nah. what I need is a tv with built in storage and high speed wifi. maybe in an easily upgradeable module that snaps in and out.



  5. docpark Says:

    I got rid of one of my DirecTV boxes and the last one, the HD one on the big set is about to go. I have a smaller flat screen for upstairs and hooking up my Mac via the DVI/HDMI cable, I was able to stream Hulu in decent if not great quality. Cable is in my house only in the form of internet and this too awaits only decent fiberoptic offerings.

    Over the air, the networks run great and this may actually save local channels from a slow multimedia death.

    I think the great aggregators (satellite, cable, phone) are done unless they can offer instant gratification.

2 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Should Apple Make TVs? | Technologizer Says:

    […] now he’s raised the idea up the flagpole again, speculating that Apple could make HDTVs and next-generation Apple TV-type functionality–including an subscription-based iTunes service designed to compete with Hulu, Netflix Watch […]

  2. apple television? | powerzamcam | bloglife Says:

    […] Philip Elmer-DeWitt has written about Munster’s scenario involving Apple making HDTVs and next-generation Apple TV-type functionality–including an subscription-based iTunes service designed to compete with Hulu, Netflix Watch […]