Opera’s Browser Hits the Big 10.0

By  |  Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 9:21 am

operaiconOpera, the Norwegian browser company that’s focused its attention on phones in recent years, has released an alpha version of Opera 10.0 for Windows, OS X, and Linux. Despite the epochal-sounding version number, Opera 10 doesn’t look to be a great leap forward compared to Opera 9.6, the current version. Opera says it’s faster, scores a perfect 100 on the Acid3 Web standards test, can auto-update itself, has inline spell-checking, and lets its e-mail client delete old mail off the server. All of which sounds either incremental or like it’s playing catchup with other browsers such as Firefox.

(I’ve been playing with the Alpha, mostly because I’m curious whether the speed boost is perceptible: It does feel faster than Firefox 3.0. On some pages. But not others. Basically, I think the speed of my Internet connection has far more impact on how snappy the Web is than the speed of my browser.)

Opera 10.0 may not be a huge whoop, but Opera is still worth checking out–even 9.6 is a solid browser, and an underappreciated one. (Browser market share studies show that it has less than one percent usage; it’s 1.68% here on Technologizer.) Compared to IE, Firefox, Safari, and Chrome, Opera feels like more of a power-user tool out of the box, with built-in e-mail, a cool speed dial feature which shows bookmarks in thumbnail form (replicable via Firefox add-on), and a pretty sophisticated architecture for running widgets that live outside the browser window. (I’m listening to Pandora via one such widget right now.) If you’re a browser junkie like me and haven’t revisited Opera recently, it’s worth a look.

It’s striking, though, how hard it is for a browser–or any application–to introduce truly striking new features by the time its version number nears or reaches double digits. Opera isn’t alone: Internet Explorer 8.0 and Firefox 3.0 are also upgrades to venerable products that have more in the way of technical improvements than groundbreaking functionality. (If Firefox counted all the versions of Netscape and Mozilla that it builds on, dating all the way back to 1994, its version number would be a lot higher.)

And of all the major browser companies, Opera seems to have the least things working in its favor. Microsoft gets to put IE on every Windows PC, making it the planet’s dominant browser (even if its share is slowly degrading). Firefox is the work of a huge open-source community, and its massive add-on library is reason enough for many people to use it. Apple gets to put Safari on every Mac. Google has huge incentive to pour effort into Chrome, and an awesome distribution pipeline if it chooses to use it. Flock, which remains my primary browser, has a well-defined niche.

Opera? Well, it’s widely used on phones, so the company has an opportunity to do interesting things involving tying the desktop and mobile experiences together. But aside from Opera Link, a bookmark-syncing utility that isn’t supported by all versions of the browser, it hasn’t done much to date.

Still, I love the fact the Web circa late 2008 has room for so many browsers. And tell you what: I’m going to switch to the Opera 10.0 alpha as my main browser for the next few days, and report back on my experiences.

 
4 Comments


Read more: ,

3 Comments For This Post

  1. Andrew Says:

    — I’m going to switch to the Opera 10.0 alpha as my main browser for the next few days, and report back on my experiences.

    Can’t wait to see the review!

    — Still, I love the fact the Web circa late 2008 has room for so many browsers.

    I don’t think it’s hard for a browser to stay in the marked if it is committed to standard compliance. Opera does a great job acing Acid 3 and removing bugs which they introduces to mimic IE’s behavior back in day.

    Is long as web sites do not sniff the browsers Opera, Safari and others just work. Because of that all those debates about the features and more importantly market share are becoming irrelevant and that’s a good thing.

    If you look at the bottom of http://www.opera.com/browser/next/ there’s a small diagram with new features pledged for beta. Alpha introduced new engine – with @font-face support!

  2. Wattsian Says:

    Given that you write in another blog post that it’s failed “spectacularly,” I think just about everybody will skip this Alpha release.

  3. steelrealm Says:

    “But aside from Opera Link, a bookmark-syncing utility that isn’t supported by all versions of the browser, it hasn’t done much to date.”

    Sort of hard to make a newly created feature work on old versions, isn’t it..?

1 Trackbacks For This Post

  1. Los navegadores que nos esperan 2009 Says:

    […] Technologizer nos hablan sobre los navegadores que saldrán a lo largo de 2009 y el estado actual de desarrollo […]